Evaluation of teacher professional learning workshops on the use of technology - a systematic review

被引:19
作者
Ahadi, Alireza [1 ,2 ]
Bower, Matt [1 ]
Lai, Jennifer [1 ]
Singh, Abhay [3 ]
Garrett, Michael [4 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Fac Arts, Sch Educ, Macquarie Pk, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Connected Intelligence Ctr, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
[3] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Business Sch, Dept Appl Finance, Macquarie Pk, NSW, Australia
[4] Cinglevue Int Pty Ltd, Unit 22-1 Walsh Loop, Joondalup, WA, Australia
关键词
Teacher change; professional development; systematic review; professional development evaluation framework; teacher professional development workshop; PRISMA; MODEL; ACCEPTANCE; EDUCATION; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/19415257.2021.2011773
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teacher professional learning workshops have been frequently used to prepare in-service and pre-service teachers for effective use of technology in education. Evaluation of these workshops is crucial to identify the effectiveness of these programmes in terms of improving teaching skills, increasing knowledge, changing attitudes, and developing capabilities which support the achievement of student learning outcomes. Multiple approaches for evaluating professional development programmes have been developed, though each with different emphases and theoretical positioning. In this systematic review, 41 research-oriented teacher professional development workshops on technology use were critically analysed to understand how such workshops are evaluated. This study examines content evaluation, instrument types, and common professional development frameworks in teacher professional development workshops and reports on their usage and alignment. Based on the findings, the majority of papers in the systematic review did not deploy comprehensive professional development evaluation models to assess teacher professional development workshops. The majority of studies did not report on the use of established instruments for the purposes of data collection. It was further observed that the majority of these studies did not attempt to evaluate different dimensions of teacher change or different dimensions related to evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 237
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Active Supervision in Pre-K-12 Settings [J].
Allen, Grant Edmund ;
Common, Eric Alan ;
Germer, Kathryn A. ;
Lane, Kathleen Lynne ;
Buckman, Mark Matthew ;
Oakes, Wendy Peia ;
Menzies, Holly Mariah .
BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2020, 45 (03) :167-182
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Fen ve teknoloji ogretmenlerine teknolojik pedagojik Alan bilgisi kazandirma amacli egitim uygulamalari ii
[3]   A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence [J].
Bates, R .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2004, 27 (03) :341-347
[4]   Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model [J].
Bhattacherjee, A .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (03) :351-370
[5]   The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J].
Biggs, J ;
Kember, D ;
Leung, DYP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 71 :133-149
[6]  
Brooke J., 1986, SYSTEM USABILITY SCA, P1
[7]  
Bruce C., 2003, INT INF LIT C M, P1
[8]  
Carroll EA, 2009, C & C 09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 ACM SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON CREATIVITY AND COGNITION, P127
[9]   Implementing a Digital Reading and Writing Workshop Model for Content Literacy Instruction in an Urban Elementary (K-8) School [J].
Ciampa, Katia .
READING TEACHER, 2016, 70 (03) :295-306
[10]   Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth [J].
Clarke, D ;
Hollingsworth, H .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2002, 18 (08) :947-967