Predictive value of performance validity testing and symptom validity testing in psychoeducational assessment

被引:17
作者
Harrison, Allyson G. [1 ]
Beal, A. Lynne
Armstrong, Irene T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Reg Assessment & Resource Ctr, 8100,Macintosh Corry Hall,68 Univ Ave, Kingston, ON K7L 3K1, Canada
关键词
Assessment; diagnosis; performance validity testing; symptom validity testing; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; BASE RATES; ADHD; EXAGGERATION; DISORDER; DEFICIT; VALIDATION; STRATEGIES; CAPACITY; INJURY;
D O I
10.1080/23279095.2021.1943396
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Using archival data from 2463 psychoeducational assessments of postsecondary students we investigated whether failure on either symptom or performance validity tests (SVTs or PVTs) was associated with score differences on various cognitive, achievement, or executive functioning performance measures or on symptom report measures related to mental health or attention complaints. In total, 14.6% of students failed one or more PVT, 33.6% failed one or more SVT, and 41.6% failed at least one validity test. Individuals who failed SVTs tended to have the highest levels of self-reported symptoms relative to other groups but did not score worse on performance-based psychological tests. Those who failed PVTs scored worse on performance-based tests relative to other groups. Failure on at least one PVT and one SVT resulted in both performance and self-reported symptoms suggestive of greater impairment compared with those who passed all validity measures. Findings also highlight the need for domain-specific SVTs; failing ADHD SVTs was associated only with extreme reports of ADHD and executive functioning symptoms while failing mental health SVTs related only to extreme reports of mental health complaints. Results support using at least one PVT and one SVT in psychoeducational assessments to aid in diagnostic certainty, given the frequency of non-credible presentation in this population of postsecondary students.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 329
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, WECHSLER INDIVIDUAL
[2]  
Barkley R.A., 2019, The ADHD Report, V27, P1, DOI DOI 10.1521/ADHD.2019.27.2.1
[3]   Non-credible symptom report in the clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: development and initial validation of a new validity index embedded in the Conners' adult ADHD rating scales [J].
Becke, Miriam ;
Tucha, Lara ;
Weisbrod, Matthias ;
Aschenbrenner, Steffen ;
Tucha, Oliver ;
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2021, 128 (07) :1045-1063
[4]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2011, MINNESOTA MULTIPHASI
[5]   Detection of Feigned ADHD Using the MOXO-d-CPT [J].
Berger, Corinne ;
Lev, Astar ;
Braw, Yoram ;
Elbaum, Tomer ;
Wagner, Michael ;
Rassovsky, Yuri .
JOURNAL OF ATTENTION DISORDERS, 2021, 25 (07) :1032-1047
[6]   Validation of a new technique to detect malingering of cognitive symptoms: The b Test [J].
Boone, KB ;
Lu, P ;
Sherman, D ;
Palmer, B ;
Back, C ;
Shamieh, E ;
Warner-Chacon, K ;
Berman, NG .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 15 (03) :227-241
[7]  
Brown J., 1993, NELSON DENNY READING
[8]  
Canadian ADHD Resource Alliance, 2017, CAN ADHD PRACT GUID
[9]  
Conners C.K., 1999, CONNERS ADULT ADHD R
[10]   Relative Utility of Performance and Symptom Validity Tests [J].
Copeland, Christopher T. ;
Mahoney, James J. ;
Block, Cady K. ;
Linck, John F. ;
Pastorek, Nicholas J. ;
Miller, Brian I. ;
Romesser, Jennifer M. ;
Sim, Anita H. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 31 (01) :18-22