Green bonds issuance, innovation performance, and corporate value: Empirical evidence from China

被引:19
作者
Khurram, Muhammad Usman [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Wenwu [3 ]
Mirza, Sultan Sikandar [4 ,5 ]
Tong, Hao [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou City Univ, Sch Business, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310027, Peoples R China
[3] Hangzhou City Univ, Inst Digital Finance, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Waikato, Waikato Management Sch, Hamilton, New Zealand
[5] Hangzhou City Univ, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Green bonds; Innovation performance; Corporate value; Emerging markets; China; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14895
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of green bond issuance on corporate performance and further checks the intermediate effect of corporate innovation performance on the primary relationship. This study uses the quarterly panel data of Chinese non-financial listed companies in 11 sub-divided industry categories from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020. Using the difference -in-difference (DID) model and the parallel trend test, it is found that companies' issuance of green bonds has a significant positive effect on improving corporate innovation performance and corporate value. Furthermore, the improvement of innovation performance assists in enhancing the promotion effect of green bond issuance on corporate value. Despite data limitations, this study's findings can be very helpful for all relevant stakeholders, especially regulators, to intro-duce conducive policies to support the issuance of green bonds in Chinese. Our findings can be useful for other emerging markets that are dealing with the same green bond-based growth-sustainability conundrum.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence [J].
Albuquerque, Rui ;
Koskinen, Yrjo ;
Zhang, Chendi .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (10) :4451-4469
[2]   Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data [J].
Aouadi A. ;
Marsat S. .
Journal of Business Ethics, 2018, 151 (4) :1027-1047
[3]  
Baker M., 2018, FINANCING RESPONSE C, DOI [10.3386/w25194, DOI 10.3386/W25194]
[4]   Stock market reaction to green bond issuance [J].
Baulkaran, Vishaal .
JOURNAL OF ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2019, 20 (05) :331-340
[5]   Green bonds for sustainable development: Review of literature on development and impact of green bonds [J].
Bhutta, Umair Saeed ;
Tariq, Adeel ;
Farrukh, Muhammad ;
Raza, Ali ;
Iqbal, Muhammad Khalid .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 175
[6]   The rise of green bonds for sustainable finance: global standards and issues with the expanding Chinese market [J].
Chen, Yujin ;
Zhao, Zhirong Jerry .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 52 :54-57
[7]   Fund flow-induced volatility and the cost of debt * [J].
Cook, Douglas O. ;
Luo, Shikong .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2023, 146
[8]  
Dikau S., 2019, HDB GREEN FINANCE, P81, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0227-5_17
[9]   Air pollution, affect, and forecasting bias: Evidence from Chinese financial analysts [J].
Dong, Rui ;
Fisman, Raymond ;
Wang, Yongxiang ;
Xu, Nianhang .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 139 (03) :971-984
[10]   Yield Component Differences between Direct-Seeded and Transplanted Super Hybrid Rice [J].
Huang, Min ;
Zou, Yingbin ;
Jiang, Peng ;
Xia, Bing ;
Feng, Yuehua ;
Cheng, Zhaowei ;
Mo, Yali .
PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2011, 14 (04) :331-338