Impacts of meteorological variables and machine learning algorithms on rice yield prediction in Korea

被引:3
|
作者
Ha, Subin [1 ]
Kim, Yong-Tak [1 ]
Im, Eun-Soon [1 ,2 ]
Hur, Jina [3 ]
Jo, Sera [3 ]
Kim, Yong-Seok [3 ]
Shim, Kyo-Moon [3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Environm & Sustainabil, Kowloon, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Inst Agr Sci, Rural Dev Adm, Jeonju Si, Jeollabuk Do, South Korea
关键词
Rice yield prediction; Machine learning model; Dynamical downscaling; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; CROP YIELD; CLIMATE-CHANGE; TIME-SERIES; WHEAT YIELD; MODIS NDVI; CORN; RESPONSES; GROWTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00484-023-02544-x
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
As crop productivity is greatly influenced by weather conditions, many attempts have been made to estimate crop yields using meteorological data and have achieved great progress with the development of machine learning. However, most yield prediction models are developed based on observational data, and the utilization of climate model output in yield prediction has been addressed in very few studies. In this study, we estimate rice yields in South Korea using the meteorological variables provided by ERA5 reanalysis data (ERA-O) and its dynamically downscaled data (ERA-DS). After ERA-O and ERA-DS are validated against observations (OBS), two different machine learning models, Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), are trained with different combinations of eight meteorological variables (mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, diurnal temperature range, solar irradiance, mean wind speed, and relative humidity) obtained from OBS, ERA-O, and ERA-DS at weekly and monthly timescales from May to September. Regardless of the model type and the source of the input data, training a model with weekly datasets leads to better yield estimates compared to monthly datasets. LSTM generally outperforms SVM, especially when the model is trained with ERA-DS data at a weekly timescale. The best yield estimates are produced by the LSTM model trained with all eight variables at a weekly timescale. Altogether this study shows the significance of high spatial and temporal resolution of input meteorological data in yield prediction, which can also serve to substantiate the added value of dynamical downscaling.
引用
收藏
页码:1825 / 1838
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impacts of meteorological variables and machine learning algorithms on rice yield prediction in Korea
    Subin Ha
    Yong-Tak Kim
    Eun-Soon Im
    Jina Hur
    Sera Jo
    Yong-Seok Kim
    Kyo‑Moon Shim
    International Journal of Biometeorology, 2023, 67 : 1825 - 1838
  • [2] Estimation of Rice Yield by Province in South Korea based on Meteorological Variables
    Hur, Jina
    Shim, Kyo-Moon
    Kim, Yongseok
    Kang, Kee-Kyung
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN EARTH SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2019, 40 (06): : 599 - 605
  • [3] Prediction of Soybean Yield in Jilin Based on Diverse Machine Learning Algorithms and Meteorological Disaster Indices
    Song, Lifang
    Song, Ruixiang
    Wang, Chengcheng
    Zhang, Xinjing
    Li, Yunfeng
    Li, Lei
    Li, Mingyan
    Zhang, Meng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHYSICS, 2024, 18 (02) : 278 - 287
  • [4] Comparative assessment of environmental variables and machine learning algorithms for maize yield prediction in the US Midwest
    Kang, Yanghui
    Ozdogan, Mutlu
    Zhu, Xiaojin
    Ye, Zhiwei
    Hain, Christopher
    Anderson, Martha
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (06)
  • [5] Yield prediction with machine learning algorithms and satellite images
    Sharifi, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2021, 101 (03) : 891 - 896
  • [6] Crop Yield Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Nigam, Aruvansh
    Garg, Saksham
    Agrawal, Archit
    Agrawal, Parul
    2019 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE INFORMATION PROCESSING (ICIIP 2019), 2019, : 125 - 130
  • [7] A Comparative Evaluation of Multiple Meteorological Datasets for the Rice Yield Prediction at the County Level in South Korea
    Cho, Subin
    Youn, Youjeong
    Kim, Seoyeon
    Jeong, Yemin
    Kim, Gunah
    Kang, Jonggu
    Kim, Kwangjin
    Cho, Jaeil
    Lee, Yangwon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 37 (02) : 337 - 357
  • [8] Maize yield and nitrate loss prediction with machine learning algorithms
    Shahhosseini, Mohsen
    Martinez-Feria, Rafael A.
    Hui, Guiping
    Archontoulis, Sotirios V.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [9] Machine Learning with Meteorological Variables for the Prediction of the Electric Field in East Lima, Peru
    Soria, Juan J.
    Poma, Orlando
    Sumire, David A.
    Fernandez Rojas, Joel Hugo
    Echevarria, Maycol O.
    PROCEEDINGS OF SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICICT 2021), VOL 2, 2022, 236 : 191 - 199
  • [10] Prediction of coastal flooding risk under climate change impacts in South Korea using machine learning algorithms
    Park, Sang-Jin
    Lee, Dong-Kun
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (09):