Primer application technique and remaining dentin thickness affected microtensile bond strength of contemporary dentin adhesives under simulated pulp pressure

被引:2
作者
Somrit, Paphawee [1 ]
Tantilertanant, Yanee [1 ]
Srisawasdi, Sirivimol [1 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Operat Dent, Henri Dunant Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词
Microtensile bond strength; Primer application technique; Remaining dentin thickness; Simulated pulp pressure; PROLONGED APPLICATION TIMES; SELF-ETCHING ADHESIVES; CORONAL DENTIN; POLYMERIZATION; DURABILITY; SYSTEMS; ENAMEL; AGENTS; LAYER;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-022-04699-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the effect of application techniques, type of adhesives and remaining dentin thicknesses on micro-tensile bond strength (mu TBS) of 3 adhesive systems. Materials and methods 112 flat occlusal dentinal surfaces of third molar were randomly allocated into 16 groups based on 2 remaining dentin thicknesses (RDT), 2 application techniques, and 3 adhesive systems (Optibond FL, OFL; Clearfil SE Bond, CSE; and Single Bond Universal, SB); SB was applied in either etch-and-rinse (ER) or self-etch (SE) mode. Simulated pulpal pressure was performed during restorative procedure and water storage. The stick-shaped specimens from each tooth underwent mu TBS testing. The data were evaluated using a paired t test and ANOVA followed by a post hoc test. The fractured specimens were evaluated for mode of failure using a stereomicroscope. Results The mean mu TBS values were significantly affected by RDT, application technique, and types of adhesives. Neither RDT nor application technique affected mu TBS of SB in ER mode, whereas application technique affected both conventional and universal self-etch adhesives. RDT also influenced mu TBS of OFL. Conclusions RDT and application technique differently affected the mu TBS of dentin bonding which was product-related. Etch-and-rinse systems had higher bond strength to superficial than to deep dentin, whereas self-etch systems were more sensitive to both RDT and application technique.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 149
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Polymerization Behavior of Hydrophilic-Rich Phase of Dentin Adhesive [J].
Abedin, F. ;
Ye, Q. ;
Parthasarathy, R. ;
Misra, A. ;
Spencer, P. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2015, 94 (03) :500-507
[2]   Effects of remaining dentin thickness, smear layer and aging on the bond strengths of self-etch adhesives to dentin [J].
Akter, Rime Shamme ;
Ahmed, Zubaer ;
Yamauti, Monica ;
Carvalho, Ricardo M. ;
Chowdhury, Abu Faem Mohammad Almas ;
Sano, Hidehiko .
DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2021, 40 (02) :538-546
[3]   Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach [J].
Armstrong, Steve ;
Breschi, Lorenzo ;
Ozcan, Mutlu ;
Pfefferkorn, Frank ;
Ferrari, Marco ;
Van Meerbeek, Bart .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2017, 33 (02) :133-143
[4]  
Arola Dwayne D, 2017, Dent Clin North Am, V61, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2017.05.001
[5]  
Bahari Mahmoud, 2021, Dent Res J (Isfahan), V18, P25
[6]   Effect of Over-Etching and Prolonged Application Time of a Universal Adhesive on Dentin Bond Strength [J].
Burrer, Phoebe ;
Dang, Hoang ;
Par, Matej ;
Attin, Thomas ;
Taubock, Tobias T. .
POLYMERS, 2020, 12 (12) :1-10
[7]   The role of polymerization in adhesive dentistry [J].
Cadenaro, Milena ;
Maravic, Tatjana ;
Comba, Allegra ;
Mazzoni, Annalisa ;
Fanfoni, Lidia ;
Hilton, Tom ;
Ferracane, Jack ;
Breschi, Lorenzo .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2019, 35 (01) :E1-E22
[8]  
Cardoso PC, 2005, J ADHES DENT, V7, P143
[9]   Microtensile bond strength of total-etch and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentine [J].
Ceballos, L ;
Camejo, DG ;
Fuentes, MV ;
Osorio, R ;
Toledano, M ;
Carvalho, RM ;
Pashley, DH .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2003, 31 (07) :469-477
[10]   Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine - Old wine in new bottles? [J].
Chen, C. ;
Niu, L. -N. ;
Xie, H. ;
Zhang, Z. -Y. ;
Zhou, L. -Q. ;
Jiao, K. ;
Chen, J. -H. ;
Pashley, D. H. ;
Tay, F. R. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2015, 43 (05) :525-536