Comparative study on infrastructure and export trade of the host country and OFDI efficiency of China

被引:3
作者
Ren, Fang-rong [1 ]
Guan, Xin-ge [2 ]
Zhang, Huai-jing [3 ]
Fang, Qi [2 ]
Si, Hong-cheng [2 ]
Tian, Ze [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Changzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Jiangbei Publ Util Construct Engn Co Ltd, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
The Belt and Road; OFDI efficiency; host country infrastructure; export trade; Europe; Asia; and Africa; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; FIRMS; BELT;
D O I
10.1080/13547860.2022.2047277
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) provides new opportunities and great space for China's outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) cooperation, as evidenced in 2018 when it financed US$15.64 billion in 56 countries along this burgeoning economic path, targeting Europe, Africa, and Asia as its hot spots. However, most of the countries along the Belt and Road are low-growth, middle-income, and developing economies, and their infrastructure, export trade, and other factors play an important role in the security and efficiency of OFDI. Therefore, this research selects 60 countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa as the objects and uses the common boundary SBM model to calculate the investment efficiency of 7 indicators from 2013 to 2017. The results show a significant regional gap in the efficiency of China's total foreign investment. The efficiency scores of European countries are generally better than those of Asian and African countries, while the technology gaps of countries in Asia and Europe are higher than that in Africa. The efficiencies of three major indicators, FDI, infrastructure development indicator (IDI), and export trade (ET), exhibit four types of distribution. Therefore, it is necessary to coordinate and optimise the proper investment layout, enhance China's investment quality in countries along the Belt and Road, strengthen exchanges and cooperation between think tanks, and promote further construction of BRI.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1116
页数:30
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Aydin N, 2014, ECON COMPUT ECON CYB, V48, P273
  • [2] A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies
    Battese, GE
    Rao, DSP
    O'Donnell, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) : 91 - 103
  • [3] Battese GE., 2002, International Journal of Business and Economics, V1, P87, DOI DOI 10.1023/B:PR0D.0000012454.06094.29
  • [4] The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment
    Buckley, Peter J.
    Clegg, L. Jeremy
    Cross, Adam R.
    Liu, Xin
    Voss, Hinrich
    Zheng, Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2007, 38 (04) : 499 - 518
  • [5] Firm's outward foreign direct investment and efficiency loss of factor price distortion: Evidence from Chinese firms
    Cheng, Hua
    Wang, Ziqi
    Peng, Dan
    Kong, Qunxi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 67 : 176 - 188
  • [6] Exploring the role of institutions in Chinese OFDI: a systematic review and integrative framework
    Christofi, Michael
    Vrontis, Demetris
    Makrides, Anna
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW, 2022, 28 (02) : 187 - 213
  • [7] Clegg, 1993, INT BUS REV, V2, P121, DOI [10.1016/0969-5931(93)90008-K, DOI 10.1016/0969-5931(93)90008-K]
  • [8] Dunning JH, 2008, MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND THE GLOBAL ECONOMY, 2ND EDITION
  • [9] [Федорова Елена Анатольевна Fedorova E.A.], 2020, [Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика, Moscow University Economics Bulletin, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6: Ekonomika], P158
  • [10] Characteristics and host country drivers of Chinese FDI in Europe: a company-level analysis
    Gammeltoft, Peter
    Fasshauer, Kirsten
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2017, 74 (1-4) : 140 - 166