RELATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS RESPONSIBILITY

被引:1
作者
De Coninck, Joyce [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Sch Law, EU Law, New York, NY 10012 USA
来源
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW | 2024年 / 45卷 / 01期
关键词
PROTECTION; EU;
D O I
10.58112/jil.45-1.3
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
When a private corporation cooperates with States as well as international organizations, and conduct stemming from this cooperation results in international human rights violations, who can be held legally responsible?This Article dissects systemic deficiencies in the traditionally state-centric human rights regime and challenges its inadequacies when dealing with contemporary forms of transnational cooperative governance. Transnational cooperative governance refers to modes of cooperation in which States, and different non -State actors work together in addressing transnational concerns that cannot be adequately regulated by any one of these actors alone.Using border management cooperation between HawkEye 360, the European Union, and its Member States as an illustration, this Article argues that in situations of cooperative governance- involving private corporations, international organizations, and States-legal responsibility for unlawful human rights conduct under the contemporary human rights regime cannot be apportioned effectively among the implicated parties. The diffusion of unlawful conduct between the implicated parties obfuscates whether primary human rights violations have occurred and how- if at all-secondary rules apply. This makes it hard to establish which actors committed a wrong capable of triggering an obligation of reparations for individual victims under international human rights law. For this reason, individual victims are ultimately left without an effective judicial remedy.To eliminate this gap in responsibility, the Article advances "Relational Human Rights Responsibility" as an alternative or complementary approach to the international human rights regime in apportioning responsibility between actors involved in transnational cooperative governance. This theoretically grounded but ultimately policy-and litigation-oriented alternative is applicable beyond the sphere of border management and designed to safeguard the relevance of international human rights law for other forms of transnational cooperative governance implicating private transnational corporations, international organizations, and States.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 179
页数:71
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Directors duties and human rights impacts: a comparative approach
    McCorquodale, Robert
    Neely, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE LAW STUDIES, 2022, 22 (02) : 605 - 639
  • [32] Characterization of environmental protection in the InterAmerican Human Rights System
    de Jesus Barreto Araujo, Luis Felipe
    da Silva, Gicelia Mendes
    REVISTA DIREITO AMBIENTAL E SOCIEDADE, 2022, 12 (02): : 111 - 131
  • [33] The edges of protectionism: limits and restrictions on the exercise of human rights
    Gonzalez Padilla, Roy
    CIENCIA JURIDICA, 2015, 4 (08): : 23 - 36
  • [34] Legal-Conflict Constellations. A Political Approach to the 'Labour Rights-Human Rights' Debate
    Lobato, Julieta
    HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW, 2024, 24 (03)
  • [35] Human rights and democracy in a global context: decoupling and recoupling
    Besson, Samantha
    ETHICS & GLOBAL POLITICS, 2011, 4 (01) : 19 - 50
  • [36] Fair and Equitable Treatment and Human Rights: A Moral and Legal Reconciliation
    Ratner, Steven R.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2022, 25 (04) : 568 - 591
  • [37] "The World is Outraged": Legitimacy in the Making of the ASEAN Human Rights Body
    Poole, Avery
    CONTEMPORARY SOUTHEAST ASIA, 2015, 37 (03): : 355 - 380
  • [38] Introduction: Interpreting the Refugee Definition via Human Rights Standards
    Burson, Bruce
    Cantor, David James
    HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE REFUGEE DEFINITION: COMPARATIVE LEGAL PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2016, 5 : 1 - +
  • [39] The principle of proportionality in the restriction of human rights during the war in Ukraine
    Kubko, Andrii
    Turchynov, Kyrylo
    Chudyk, Nataliia
    Vladymyrov, Maksym
    Matviichuk, Andrii
    AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2024, 13 (82): : 139 - 149
  • [40] Why Incorporate the ECHR? The Domestic Incentives of Human Rights Commitment
    Schaffer, Johan Karlsson
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2024, 68 (02)