Improving Biohydrogen Production by Dark Fermentation of Milk Processing Wastewater by Physicochemical and Enzymatic Pretreatments

被引:7
作者
Bouchareb, Esma Mahfouf [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Derbal, Kerroum [3 ,4 ]
Bedri, Rayane [2 ]
Slimani, Khaled [2 ]
Menas, Souha [2 ]
Lazreg, Halima [2 ]
Maaref, Feriel [2 ]
Ouabdelkader, Samir [2 ]
Saheb, Aya [2 ]
Bouaita, Rokaya [4 ]
Bouchareb, Raouf [1 ,3 ]
Dizge, Nadir [5 ]
机构
[1] Saleh Boubnider Univ, Proc Engn Fac, Dept Environm Engn, Constantine 25000, Algeria
[2] Natl High Sch Biotechnol Toufik Khaznadar, Dept Engn, Constantine, Algeria
[3] Natl Polytech Sch Constantine, Lab Proc Engn Sustainable Dev & Hlth Prod LGPDDPS, Constantine 25000, Algeria
[4] Natl Polytech Sch Constantine Malek Bennabi, Dept Proc Engn, Constantine, Algeria
[5] Mersin Univ, Dept Environm Engn, TR-33343 Mersin, Turkiye
关键词
Enzymatic pretreatment; Physicochemical pretreatment; Biohydrogen; Lactase; BHP test; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.1007/s12010-023-04619-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biohydrogen is considered an alternative energy reserve. Dark fermentation is one of the important green hydrogen production techniques that utilizes organic waste as raw material. It is a promising bioconversion, easy, not expensive, and cost-effective process. Milk processing wastewater (MPWW) is an organic effluent generated in large volumes on a daily basis and disposed directly into the environment. In this research, the study of biochemical hydrogen potential (BHP) test of MPWW was evaluated and used as substrate (S). A waste sludge was used as an inoculum (I) and source of bacteria. Both substrate and inoculum were analyzed and the study was based mainly on the ratio of volatile solids (VS) of inoculum and substrate subsequently, which was noted as I/S. Different substrate pretreatments were performed: ultrasonic, thermal, chemical, and enzymatic hydrolysis. The I/S ratio impact was investigated and evaluated the hydrogen production improvement. Modified Gompertz and modified Logistic kinetic models were employed for the kinetic modeling of cumulative hydrogen production values. Results show that I/S ratio of 1/4 gVS/gVS resulted from the best hydrogen production of 59.96 mL during 30 days of MPWW fermentation without pretreatment. It was also shown that all the adopted pretreatments enhanced hydrogen production, whereas ultrasonic pretreatment for 5 min increased the production by only 14.84%. Heat pretreatment was more efficient, where the hydrogen production increased from 60 to 162 mL (170% of improvement) using heat shock at 90 & DEG;C for 30 min. The impact of chemical pretreatment was different from a reagent to another. Pretreatment using calcium hydroxide resulted in the biggest hydrogen production of 165.3 mL (175.5%) compared to the other chemical pretreatments. However, the best hydrogen production was given by the biological pretreatment using enzymatic hydrolysis (Lactase) resulting in 254 mL of hydrogen production, which is equivalent to 323.62% of production improvement. Modified Gompertz and Logistic kinetic models fitted well with experimental data. Thus, the enzymatic hydrolysis of MPWW proved to be a promising technique for biohydrogen production enhancement.
引用
收藏
页码:2741 / 2756
页数:16
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Composition variability of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and effects on hydrogen and methane production potentials
    Alibardi, Luca
    Cossu, Raffaello
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 36 : 147 - 155
  • [2] Andre N., 2019, ROBUST ENV LIFE CYCL, P3473
  • [3] Bioreactors and biophoton-driven biohydrogen production strategies
    Anjum, Sadia
    Aslam, Shakira
    Hussain, Nazim
    Bilal, Muhammad
    Boczkaj, Grzegorz
    Smulek, Wojciech
    Jesionowski, Teofil
    Iqbal, Hafiz M. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (55) : 21176 - 21188
  • [4] APHA, 2012, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, V22nd
  • [5] Enhanced mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste by thermal pretreatment: Substrate versus digestate heating
    Ariunbaatar, Javkhlan
    Panico, Antonio
    Yeh, Daniel H.
    Pirozzi, Francesco
    Lens, Piet N. L.
    Esposito, Giovanni
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 46 : 176 - 181
  • [6] Bouaita R, 2019, J NEW TECHNOL MATER, V8, P76
  • [7] Bouaita R., 2019, BIOGAS PRODUCTION AN, P1, DOI [10.1080/15567036.2019.1692975, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2019.1692975]
  • [8] Production of bio-hydrogen from bulgur processing industry wastewater
    Bouchareb, Esma Mahfouf
    Kerroum, Derbal
    Arikan, Ezgi Bezirhan
    Isik, Zelal
    Dizge, Nadir
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2025, 47 (01) : 4685 - 4698
  • [9] Combined natural/chemical coagulation and membrane filtration for wood processing wastewater treatment
    Bouchareb, Raouf
    Derbal, Kerroum
    Ozay, Yasin
    Bilici, Zeynep
    Dizge, Nadir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2020, 37
  • [10] Systematic Review of the Gastrointestinal Effects of A1 Compared with A2 β-Casein
    Brooke-Taylor, Simon
    Dwyer, Karen
    Woodford, Keith
    Kost, Natalya
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2017, 8 (05) : 739 - 748