The Relationships Between Internal Program Measures and a High-Stakes Teacher Licensing Measure in Mathematics Teacher Preparation: Program Design Considerations

被引:1
作者
Zelkowski, Jeremy [1 ,4 ]
Campbell, Tye [2 ]
Moldavan, Alesia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Math Educ Teacher Educa programs, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[2] Crandall Univ Educ, Moncton, NB, Canada
[3] Georgia Southern Univ, Statesboro, GA USA
[4] Univ Alabama, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
teacher education preparation; mathematics teacher education; educational policy; accountability; assessment; program design; path analysis; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE; ACCOUNTABILITY; PERFORMANCE; LEARN; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/00224871231180214
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Accountability measures have quickly entered into formal teacher-preparation programs. As a response, we introduce the use of structural equation modeling vis-a-vis path analysis in secondary-grade mathematics teacher preparation as a methodology to test models to understand the strength of relationships to recommendations of prominent professional organizations and standards for entering the teaching profession. This longitudinal, 6-year, five-cohort study examines the relationship of program design sequencing and core components (internal measures) to an externally scored high-stakes teacher licensing examination portfolio intended to measure pedagogical content knowledge and first-year teacher readiness. The internal measures and program sequencing model explains 49.2% of the variance in relation to the standardized outcome teaching portfolio examination with high-power and medium- to large-effect statistics. We provide implications for teacher preparation with respect to recommendations of professional organizations, governments, and accreditation standards. Results should stimulate discussions and fuel future research efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 75
页数:18
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, 2020, PART MAP
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, Guiding principles for secondary mathematics teacher preparation programs
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Common core state standards
  • [4] Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, 2017, STAND PREP TEACH MAT
  • [5] Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, 2012, SCI MATH TEACH IMP S
  • [6] A case study of elementary teacher candidates' preparation for a high stakes teacher performance assessment
    Auslander, Susan Swars
    Smith, Stephanie Z.
    Smith, Marvin E.
    Myers, Kayla
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION, 2020, 23 (03) : 269 - 291
  • [7] Babbie E. R., 2020, The Practice of Social Research.
  • [8] Content Knowledge for Teaching What Makes It Special?
    Ball, Deborah Loewenberg
    Thames, Mark Hoover
    Phelps, Geoffrey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2008, 59 (05) : 389 - 407
  • [9] Bryk A.S., 2010, GETTING IDEAS ACTION
  • [10] Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects
    Clotfelter, Charles T.
    Ladd, Helen F.
    Vigdor, Jacob L.
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2007, 26 (06) : 673 - 682