Teachers' framing of students' difficulties in mathematics learning in collegial discussions

被引:0
作者
Kaufmann, Odd Tore [1 ]
Ryve, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ostfold Univ Coll, Fac Educ, Halden, Norway
[2] Malardalen Univ, Vasteras, Sweden
关键词
Student difficulties; mathematics teachers; diagnostic framing; prognostic framing; collegial discussion; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/00313831.2022.2115134
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic framings of Swedish mathematics teachers regarding the difficulties experienced by students in mathematics learning. Collegial discussions among 65 mathematics teachers in nine collegial groups were videotaped during a professional development (PD) program entitled Boost for Mathematics for analysis. The results show that the diagnostic framings of the teachers were mainly attributed to the cognitive abilities of students, whereas the prognostic framings were mainly related to lesson organization such that students should collaborate. While the teachers emphasize collaborate group work, they put little emphasis on how they could act in these learning situations. These results contribute to the understanding of Swedish mathematics teachers' framing of students' difficulties in mathematics learning and to the role of collegial discussions in PD initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1085
页数:17
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   PROFESSIONAL VISION [J].
GOODWIN, C .
AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, 1994, 96 (03) :606-633
[22]  
Gresalfi MS, 2011, J RES MATH EDUC, V42, P270
[23]   Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers' conversations [J].
Horn, Ilana Seidel .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2007, 16 (01) :37-79
[24]  
Jackson K., 2018, Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office, P43
[25]  
Jackson K, 2017, TEACH COLL REC, V119
[26]   Approaching Participation in School-Based Mathematics as a Cross-Setting Phenomenon [J].
Jackson, Kara .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2011, 20 (01) :111-150
[27]  
Kazemi E., 2004, J MATH TEACH EDUC, V7, P203, DOI [10.1023/B:JMTE.0000033084.26326.19, DOI 10.1023/B:JMTE.0000033084.26326.19]
[28]  
[Kilpatrick J. National Research Council National Research Council], 2001, Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
[29]  
Lahann P., 2020, ENCY MATH ED, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_23
[30]   Critical features of professional development programs: Comparing content focus and impact of two large-scale programs [J].
Lindvall, Jannika ;
Helenius, Ola ;
Wiberg, Marie .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2018, 70 :121-131