Effective R&D Decision Making in Competitive Environments: A Quantitative Framework

被引:3
作者
Calafut, Mark Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Mazzuchi, Thomas A. [2 ]
Sarkani, Shahram [2 ]
机构
[1] US Army Command, Control Commun Comp Cyber Intelligence Surveillan, Aberdeen, MD 21001 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Washington, DC 20052 USA
关键词
Research and development; Decision making; Organizations; Mathematical model; Portfolios; Uncertainty; Software; Agent-based modeling (ABM); multicriteria decision-making; RandD management; stochastic knapsack problem (KP); DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; SIMULATION; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2021.3076350
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
R&D decision making is a critical element of engineering management. As decision makers consider R&D opportunities in practice, competition is often a driving factor in determining opportunity value. This dynamic is reflected in the classic case of multiple organizations researching a new technology in which one is first to patent and receives the majority of the rewards. Despite its importance, competition is challenging to analyze and account for in decision making. In this article, we establish a quantitative framework to determine effective decision-making behaviors for competitive environments. The approach is built on the concept that R&D decision making can be mathematically optimized for the resulting postcompetition value (PCV) of opportunities, rather than for their initial precompetition value. Our framework utilizes an agent-based model to simulate the forms of interactive competition and determine PCV Within the framework, we consider candidate decision-making behaviors and characterize their performance in different competitive environments. This defines the optimal strategy region for decision making and, correspondingly, the relative gains in PCV that can be attained in each competitive environment through improved decision making. We synthesize the results into practical heuristics, which can be implemented by engineering managers to effectively account for competition in their R&D decision process and gain a competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:2165 / 2183
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Practical Profiles for Managing Systems Engineering R&D [J].
Agresti, William W. ;
Harris, Richard M. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2009, 56 (02) :341-351
[2]   R AND D PROJECT SELECTION MODELS - ASSESSMENT [J].
BAKER, NR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1974, EM21 (04) :165-171
[3]   A combined approach for fuzzy multi-objective multiple knapsack problems for defence project selection. [J].
Bakirli, B. B. ;
Gencer, C. ;
Aydogan, E. K. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (07) :1001-1016
[4]   A conceptual framework for ranking R&D projects [J].
Bitman, William Robert ;
Sharif, Nawaz .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2008, 55 (02) :267-278
[5]   Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems [J].
Bonabeau, E .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 :7280-7287
[6]   A Quantitative Framework for Managing Project Value, Risk, and Opportunity [J].
Browning, Tyson R. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2014, 61 (04) :583-598
[7]   Deter and protect: crime modeling with multi-agent learning [J].
Caskey, Trevor R. ;
Wasek, James S. ;
Franz, Anna Y. .
COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2018, 4 (03) :155-169
[8]   SELECTION OF R+D PROGRAM CONTENT - SURVEY OF QQUANTITATIVE METHODS [J].
CETRON, MJ ;
MARTINO, J ;
ROEPCKE, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1967, EM14 (01) :4-&
[9]   A Decision Analysis Approach to Solving the Signaling Game [J].
Cobb, Barry R. ;
Basuchoudhary, Atin .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2009, 6 (04) :239-255
[10]   New product portfolio management: Practices and performance [J].
Cooper, RG ;
Edgett, SJ ;
Kleinschmidt, EJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1999, 16 (04) :333-351