3D modelling of asphalt concrete overlay based on GPR data

被引:0
作者
Domitrovic, Josipa [1 ]
Bezina, Sime [1 ]
Stanceric, Ivica [1 ]
Rukavina, Tatjana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Transportat Engn, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
Ground-penetrating radar; 3D modelling; layer thickness; airport pavement; Delaunay triangulation; spatial representation; GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR; BRIDGE DECK CONDITION; LAYER THICKNESSES; TREE ROOTS; ACCURACY; OPTIMIZATION; PAVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1080/10298436.2021.2004413
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
For proper rehabilitation planning and appropriate technology selection for airport pavements, information on the layer thicknesses is important. Pavement layer thickness can be determined by ground penetrating radar (GPR). GPR data is usually displayed in distance vs thickness diagrams. These two-dimensional displays do not utilise the full potential of the three-dimensional (3D) information of GPR data. To appropriately represent the data, the display should be 3D, as well. The aim of this study is to present a process for creating a 3D model and spatial representation of asphalt concrete (AC) overlay thickness. The 3D model of the AC overlay surface is generated based on the Delaunay triangulation of interpreted GPR data. The 3D model is presented on contour and band maps, whose accuracy is evaluated by comparing the thicknesses displayed by the contour maps with those measured in core samples. The calculated mean relative error of the contour map is 7.2%. The band map is used to identify sections of equal thickness or to analyse predefined sections, to select the appropriate rehabilitation technology. The combination of the interpreted GPR data and Delaunay triangulation successfully compensates for the lack of 3D GPR, in terms of the spatial representation of layer thickness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Measuring layer thicknesses with GPR - Theory to practice
    Al-Qadi, IL
    Lahouar, S
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2005, 19 (10) : 763 - 772
  • [2] Al-Qadi IL, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, P69
  • [3] Autodesk Civil 3D, 2020, US GUID AUT KNOWL NE
  • [4] Ayala-Cabrera D., 2016, ATHENS J TECHNOLOGY, V3, P241
  • [5] Benedetto A, 2015, SPR TRANS CIV ENV EN, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04813-0
  • [6] Correction for the asphalt overlay thickness of flexible pavements considering pavement conditions
    Bianchini, Alessandra
    Gonzalez, Carlos R.
    Bell, Haley P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2018, 19 (07) : 577 - 585
  • [7] Pavement layer thickness variability evaluation and effect on performance life
    Dalla Valle, Paola
    Thom, Nick
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2020, 21 (07) : 930 - 938
  • [8] Evaluation of pavement layer thicknesses using GPR: A comparison between full-wave inversion and the straight-ray method
    De Coster, Alberic
    Van der Wielen, Audrey
    Gregoire, Colette
    Lambot, Sebastien
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 168 : 91 - 104
  • [9] Algorithms for visibility computation on terrains: a survey
    De Floriani, L
    Magillo, P
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2003, 30 (05) : 709 - 728
  • [10] Dyana A., 2012, 2012 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), P858, DOI 10.1109/ICGPR.2012.6254982