MAPPING ORGANIZATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF WORK PERFORMANCE

被引:0
作者
Infante-Rejano, Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Seville, Spain
来源
ANDULI | 2024年 / 25期
关键词
Gilbert's BEM; work performance; EFA; organizational effectiveness; corporate longevity;
D O I
10.12795/anduli.2024.i25.06
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The purpose of the present research was to identify and assess key organizational factors affecting work performance via Gilbert's Behavioral Engineering Model (BEM). Therefore, a self-made scale considering BEM's dimensions was developed and tested. Data were gathered from the 1st of April to the end of May 2023, using a randomly stratified sample of 297 Mexican companies of Sonora State. The final questionnaire - named ADOPT-provided adequate psychometric properties to assess eight organizational factors of human performance proposed. ADOPT liability and validity are shown in the light of commented literature and data on present organizational effectiveness and corporate longevity. Main results indicate a global alpha scale liability of .92 being Task Support, knowledge/Competences, and Context most valued predictors of organizational effectiveness, followed by Aims/Objectives and Feedback factors. It was also confirmed that both contextual (environmental level) and behavioral (individual level) type of supports are equally important in predicting work performance. Evidence indicates that organizational performance management in SMEs is highly achieved on a long-term basis by attending these key factors in a specific loop, ie contextualizing, system maintenance (feedback), and empowering. This sequence supports personnel assessments as essential for empowering decision-making processes.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Anstey E., 1966, Psychological test
[2]  
Bernardez M.L., 2009, Desempeno Humano Manual de consultoria, VI
[3]   Achieving Business Success by Developing Clients and Community: Lessons from Leading Companies, Emerging Economies and a Nine Year Case Study [J].
Bernardez, Mariano .
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT QUARTERLY, 2005, 18 (03) :37-55
[4]  
Brethower D.M., 2007, PERFORMANCE ANAL KNO, VVolume 2
[5]   A history of organizational behavior management [J].
Brethower, Dale M. ;
Dickinson, Alyce M. ;
Johnson, Douglas A. ;
Johnson, C. Merle .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2022, 42 (01) :3-35
[6]   Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos-repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity [J].
Burgelman, Robert A. ;
Grove, Andrew S. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (10) :965-979
[7]   Learning With Scenarios: Summary and Critical Issues [J].
Burt, George ;
Chermack, Thomas J. .
ADVANCES IN DEVELOPING HUMAN RESOURCES, 2008, 10 (02) :285-295
[8]   A matter of life and death: innovation and firm survival [J].
Cefis, E ;
Marsili, O .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2005, 14 (06) :1167-1192
[9]   Goal orientations, leader-leader exchange, trust, and the outcomes of project performance [J].
Chen, Hong Long ;
Lin, Ying Lien .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 36 (05) :716-729
[10]   Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of learning organization characteristics [J].
Chermack, Thomas J. ;
Lynham, Susan A. ;
van der Merwe, Louis .
FUTURES, 2006, 38 (07) :767-777