Phi, Fei, Fo, Fum: Effect Sizes for Categorical Data That Use the Chi-Squared Statistic

被引:17
作者
Ben-Shachar, Mattan S.
Patil, Indrajeet [1 ]
Theriault, Remi [2 ]
Wiernik, Brenton M.
Luedecke, Daniel [3 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Humans & Machines, D-13437 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Quebec Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ H2X 3P2, Canada
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Med Sociol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
effect sizes; chi-squared test; Phi; Cramer's V; Fei;
D O I
10.3390/math11091982
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
In both theoretical and applied research, it is often of interest to assess the strength of an observed association. Existing guidelines also frequently recommend going beyond null-hypothesis significance testing and reporting effect sizes and their confidence intervals. As such, measures of effect sizes are increasingly reported, valued, and understood. Beyond their value in shaping the interpretation of the results from a given study, reporting effect sizes is critical for meta-analyses, which rely on their aggregation. We review the most common effect sizes for analyses of categorical variables that use the ?(2) (chi-square) statistic and introduce a new effect size-? (Fei, pronounced "fay"). We demonstrate the implementation of these measures and their confidence intervals via the effectsize package in the R programming language.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Science, V349, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAC4716
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
[3]  
Ben-Shachar M, 2020, J OPEN SOURCE SOFTW, V5, P2815, DOI [10.21105/joss.02815, 10.21105/joss.02815, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.02815]
[4]   Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 [J].
Camerer, Colin F. ;
Dreber, Anna ;
Holzmeister, Felix ;
Ho, Teck-Hua ;
Huber, Juegen ;
Johannesson, Magnus ;
Kirchler, Michael ;
Nave, Gideon ;
Nosek, Brian A. ;
Pfeiffer, Thomas ;
Altmejd, Adam ;
Buttrick, Nick ;
Chan, Taizan ;
Chen, Yiling ;
Forsell, Eskil ;
Gampa, Anup ;
Heikensten, Emma ;
Hummer, Lily ;
Imai, Taisuke ;
Isaksson, Siri ;
Manfredi, Dylan ;
Rose, Julia ;
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan ;
Wu, Hang .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 2 (09) :637-644
[5]   The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation [J].
Chicco, Davide ;
Jurman, Giuseppe .
BMC GENOMICS, 2020, 21 (01)
[6]  
Cohen J. W, 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[7]  
Cramer H., 1999, Mathematical Methods of Statistics
[8]   The New Statistics: Why and How [J].
Cumming, Geoff .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (01) :7-29
[9]   The Relative Merits of Risk Ratios and Odds Ratios [J].
Cummings, Peter .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2009, 163 (05) :438-445
[10]   The impact of research synthesis methods on industrial-organizational psychology: The road from pessimism to optimism about cumulative knowledge [J].
DeGeest, David S. ;
Schmidt, Frank L. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (3-4) :185-197