Evaluation of Public Perception About Sustainable Crop Residue Management Practices and Health Effects in Haryana, India

被引:0
作者
Mor, Sahil [1 ]
Ravindra, Khaiwal [2 ]
Bhukal, Santosh [1 ]
Mor, Veenu [3 ]
Bishnoi, Narsi Ram [1 ]
机构
[1] Guru Jambheshwar Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Hisar, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res PGIMER, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Med, Chandigarh 160012, India
[3] Panjab Univ, Chandigarh 160014, India
关键词
Crop residue burning; Air pollution; Health impacts; Public perception; Sustainable management; AIR-QUALITY; EMISSIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-023-06196-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Open burning of agricultural residue adversely impacts climate change, air quality, and public health. Considering this, the current study examines the public and farmer's perceptions about crop residue burning (CRB), including the obstacles to sustainable crop residue management practices and health implications in Haryana, India. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted with 418 study participants, having 56.1% of respondents as male and 43.4% as female. Results indicate a statistically significant association between CRB, socio-demographic factors, and respiratory issues. The study found that respiratory problems caused by CRB were more severe in the 60 + age group (93.3%) and the < 18 age group (70%). There is a mixed response from males (64%) and females (67.6%) regarding the impact of CRB on respiratory health. The study cites a variety of reasons for not adopting alternative technologies for crop residue management which include high cost (48%), followed by the unavailability of alternative technology (22%) and the belief that alternative technologies are not beneficial for timely clearing crop residues (13%). The minimum compensation required by farmers to avoid CRB varies significantly among respondents, with 45% citing INR 10,000 ($120) per acre as the minimum amount. The study also appraises behavioral and societal aspects of adopting new technologies. It was reported that government schemes have implementation challenges, but recycling crop residues for commercial use has a considerable scope. Considering this, the study also discusses the way ahead in light of the various initiatives the government has taken up for sustainable crop residue management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Why do farmers burn rice residue? Examining farmers' choices in Punjab, Pakistan
    Ahmed, Tanvir
    Ahmad, Bashir
    Ahmad, Waseem
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 47 : 448 - 458
  • [2] Insight into the binding of copper(II) by non-toxic biodegradable material (Oryza sativa): effect of modification and interfering ions
    Athar, Makshoof
    Farooq, Umar
    Ali, Sana Z.
    Salman, M.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2014, 16 (03) : 579 - 590
  • [3] Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions
    Bhuvaneshwari, S.
    Hettiarachchi, Hiroshan
    Meegoda, Jay N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (05)
  • [4] Burrichter K., 2022, CURR CONTENTS, V27, P119
  • [5] Central Electricity Authority (CEA), US
  • [6] Bioenergy from rice crop residues: role in developing economies
    Chakma, Sankar
    Ranjan, Amrita
    Choudhury, Hanif A.
    Dikshit, Pritam Kumar
    Moholkar, Vijayanand S.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (02) : 373 - 394
  • [7] A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China
    Chen, Jianmin
    Li, Chunlin
    Ristovski, Zoran
    Milic, Andelija
    Gu, Yuantong
    Islam, Mohammad S.
    Wang, Shuxiao
    Hao, Jiming
    Zhang, Hefeng
    He, Congrong
    Guo, Hai
    Fu, Hongbo
    Miljevic, Branka
    Morawska, Lidia
    Phong Thai
    Lam, Yun Fat
    Pereira, Gavin
    Ding, Aijun
    Huang, Xin
    Dumka, Umesh C.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 579 : 1000 - 1034
  • [8] Choudhary Anuradha, 2022, Indian Journal of Extension Education, V58, P85
  • [9] Dey S., 2022, INT J AGR SUSTAIN, V9, P10, DOI [10.18488/ijsar.v9i1.2937, DOI 10.18488/IJSAR.V9I1.2937]
  • [10] Dhall N., 2020, J MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, V11, P7