Social workers' engagement in social rights advocacy: individual capacities, organizational milieus, and associations with the working alliance

被引:3
作者
Sabag, Yael [1 ]
Levin, Lia [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Bob Shapell Sch Social Work, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Social rights advocacy; supervisor support; work environment; knowledge and skills; working alliance; NON-TAKE; WELFARE; INTERVENTION; VALIDATION; NETWORKS; SERVICES; POVERTY; ADVICE; REFORM; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/13691457.2022.2094346
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
The non-take-up of rights among social service-users is a well-known phenomenon, with grave implications. In response to it, social workers holding various roles are tasked with assisting service-users in obtaining their rights, in accordance with national policies and professional ethics. Despite its importance, research examining factors possibly connected to social workers' engagement in social rights advocacy for/with service-users is very limited, and was mostly conducted several years ago. The purpose of the present study was to explore the role of three types of such factors - organizational milieus (supervisors' support and the adequacy of the working environment); individual capacities (knowledge and skills held by social workers); and the relational aspect (the working alliance between social workers and their service-users). 247 Israeli social workers participated in the study, all employed in public social services. Data were collected using a quantitative approach via an online questionnaire. The results of the study underscore some potent correlates and predictors of social workers' engagement in advocating for social rights, in themselves and especially in the interaction between factors. This is discussed with relation to previous research, policy trends, and contemporary theoretical approaches to social rights advocacy.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 690
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Human rights as an opportunity and challenge for social work in a changing Norwegian welfare state
    Alseth, Ann Kristin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 23 (06) : 920 - 932
  • [2] Social work and COVID-19 pandemic: An action call
    Amadasun, Solomon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 63 (06) : 753 - 756
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, WELFARE STATES COMP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1958, WELFARE SERVICES ACT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2007, EXPLORING SOCIAL RIG
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, NEUES HDB ARMUT SCHW
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1980, M SOC PSYCH RES PAC
  • [8] Arazi T., 2020, PROFESSIONAL STATUS
  • [9] The non-take up of long-term care benefit in France: A pecuniary motive?
    Arrighi, Yves
    Davin, Berengere
    Trannoy, Alain
    Ventelou, Bruno
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 119 (10) : 1338 - 1348
  • [10] Austin M.J., 2009, MANAGING CHALLENGES