Belated stock returns for green innovation under carbon emissions trading market

被引:24
作者
Chen, Fanglin [1 ]
Chen, Zhongfei [2 ]
Zhang, Xin [2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Govt, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Sch Econ, Guangzhou 510632, Peoples R China
关键词
Emission trading schemes; Delayed trading; Green innovation; Stock price; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; FIRM AGE; CHINA; POLLUTION; EXPOSURE; COUNTRY; COSTS; MODEL; PRICE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102558
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Carbon trading is an important market mechanism to achieve carbon neutrality. This study explores the possible impact of carbon markets on the stock market performance of listed companies using data from 2013 to 2022 in China's carbon trading pilot regions. Using the event shock of delayed trading in the Chinese carbon market, we attempt to answer the question of the role of green innovation hidden under the compliance event. Results show that a 1% increase in carbon market turnover leads to an average decrease of CNY 0.123 in the company's stock price. Largescale companies that have been listed for a short time and have poor green innovation capabilities are more vulnerable to the carbon market. Under delayed trading, firms with high green innovation capability will be profitable. By contrast, profitability is not reflected in low green innovation firms. Companies with low green innovation can reduce stock market performance owing to the carbon market's undersupply situation. Our study reveals the stock performance of different carbon trading entities under delayed trading, providing a realistic basis for firms to choose green innovation while helping to improve carbon trading market dynamics.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 80 条
[31]   Pass-Through of Emissions Costs in Electricity Markets [J].
Fabra, Natalia ;
Reguant, Mar .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (09) :2872-2899
[32]   Industry costs of equity [J].
Fama, EF ;
French, KR .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 43 (02) :153-193
[33]   A five-factor asset pricing model [J].
Fama, Eugene F. ;
French, Kenneth R. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 116 (01) :1-22
[34]   Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? [J].
Fang, Vivian W. ;
Tian, Xuan ;
Tice, Sheri .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2014, 69 (05) :2085-2125
[35]   Environmental policy, the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: Effects of learning and technological progress [J].
Feichtinger, G ;
Hartl, RF ;
Kort, PM ;
Veliov, VM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 50 (02) :434-446
[36]   What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California's NOx Trading Program [J].
Fowlie, Meredith ;
Holland, Stephen P. ;
Mansur, Erin T. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (02) :965-993
[37]   Long-term climate implications of twenty-first century options for carbon dioxide emission mitigation [J].
Friedlingstein, P. ;
Solomon, S. ;
Plattner, G-K. ;
Knutti, R. ;
Ciais, P. ;
Raupach, M. R. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2011, 1 (09) :457-461
[38]   CONSISTENT CLIMATE POLICIES [J].
Gerlagh, Reyer ;
Liski, Matti .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2018, 16 (01) :1-44
[39]   Trade Adjustment and Productivity in Large Crises [J].
Gopinath, Gita ;
Neiman, Brent .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (03) :793-831
[40]   Does green innovation increase enterprise value? [J].
Hao, Xinyue ;
Chen, Fanglin ;
Chen, Zhongfei .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (03) :1232-1247