Comparison of urethral parameters in females presenting cystoceles with and without stress urinary incontinence based on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: are they different?

被引:0
作者
Tang, Lian [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Shiqi [2 ]
Chen, Chunlin [2 ]
Feng, Jie [3 ]
Chen, Lan [2 ]
Peng, Cheng [2 ]
Liu, Ping [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1838 Guangzhou Ave North, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cystocele; Stress urinary incontinence; Magnetic resonance imaging; PELVIC FLOOR; BLADDER; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; MOBILITY; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-023-04175-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare urethral parameters between cystocele patients with and without stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and explore factors influencing SUI in cystocele patients via dynamic MRI. Methods The two-dimensional parameters evaluated included the paravaginal defects, levator ani muscle defects, urethral length, urethral funnel shape, bladder neck funnel width, bladder neck funnel depth, urethral angle, posterior vesicourethral angle, and anterior bladder protrusion. The three-dimensional parameters included the proximal urethra rotation angle, the distal urethra rotation angle, bladder neck mobility, urethral midpoint mobility, and external urethral meatus mobility. The independent samples t test was used for continuous variables, and the chi-square test was used for categorical variables. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with SUI in cystocele patients. Results The baseline parameters were similar between the 2 groups. Cystocele patients with SUI had a significantly higher point Aa (1.63 +/- 1.06 cm vs. 0.81 +/- 1.51 cm, p = 0.008); more anterior bladder protrusion (33.3% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.017); greater bladder neck mobility (36.38 +/- 11.46 mm vs. 28.81 +/- 11.72 mm, p = 0.005); mid-urethral mobility (22.94 +/- 6.50 mm vs. 19.23 +/- 6.65 mm, p = 0.014); and external urethral meatus mobility (22.42 +/- 8.16 mm vs. 18.03 +/- 8.51 mm, p = 0.022) than did cystocele patients without SUI. The other urethral parameters were similar in the groups (p > 0.05). Binary logistic regression showed that bladder neck mobility was independently associated with SUI in females with cystoceles (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 1.015-1.107; p = 0.009). Conclusion Cystocele patients with SUI have a higher point Aa, more anterior bladder protrusion, and greater urethral mobility than those without SUI. Bladder neck mobility is independently associated with SUI in females with cystoceles.Registration number: NCT03146195. Conclusion Cystocele patients with SUI have a higher point Aa, more anterior bladder protrusion, and greater urethral mobility than those without SUI. Bladder neck mobility is independently associated with SUI in females with cystoceles.Registration number: NCT03146195.
引用
收藏
页码:2902 / 2912
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [21] Comparison of Different Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Descriptors and Clinical Findings Among Breast Cancer Subtypes Determined Based on Molecular Assessment
    Dogan, Serap
    Ozmen, Soner
    Oz, Bahadir
    Imamoglu, Hakan
    Kahriman, Guven
    Zararsiz, Gokmen
    Ozturk, Mustafa
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (04)
  • [22] Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis using dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor, hemodynamic, and pharmacokinetic parameters
    Ikeda, O
    Nishimura, R
    Miyayama, H
    Yasunaga, T
    Ozaki, Y
    Tuji, A
    Yamashita, Y
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2004, 45 (04) : 446 - 452
  • [23] Multiple parameters from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate between benign and malignant breast lesions: Comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient
    Cao, Ying
    Wang, Xiaoxia
    Shi, Jinfang
    Zeng, Xiangfei
    Du, Lihong
    Li, Qing
    Nickel, Dominik
    Zhou, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Jiuquan
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2023, 104 (06) : 275 - 283
  • [24] Region of interest and pixel-by-pixel analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and time-intensity curve shapes: a comparison in chondroid tumors
    Lavini, Cristina
    Pikaart, Branko P.
    de Jonge, Milko C.
    Schaap, Gerard R.
    Maas, Mario
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (01) : 62 - 68
  • [25] Estimation of error in maximal intensity projection-based internal target volume of lung tumors: A simulation and comparison study using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging
    Cai, Jing
    Read, Paul W.
    Baisden, Joseph M.
    Larner, James M.
    Benedict, Stanley H.
    Sheng, Ke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : 895 - 902
  • [26] Test-retest analysis of cerebral oxygen extraction estimates in healthy volunteers: comparison of methods based on quantitative susceptibility mapping and dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging
    Wirestam, Ronnie
    Lundberg, Anna
    Chakwizira, Arthur
    van Westen, Danielle
    Knutsson, Linda
    Lind, Emelie
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (12)
  • [27] Comparison of different semiquantitative parameters for the assessment of a myocardial perfusion reserve index by magnetic resonance imaging [Vergleich verschiedener parameter zur bestimmung eines index der myokardialen perfusionsreserve zur erkennung von koronarstenosen mit kardiovaskulärer magnetresonanztomographie]
    Al-Saadi N.
    Gross M.
    Bornstedt A.
    Schnackenburg B.
    Klein C.
    Fleck E.
    Nagel E.
    Zeitschrift für Kardiologie, 2001, 90 (11): : 824 - 834
  • [28] High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Biomechanical Stress Analysis of Carotid Atheroma: A Comparison of Single Transient Ischaemic Attack, Recurrent Transient Ischaemic Attacks, Non-disabling Stroke and Asymptomatic Patient Groups
    Sadat, U.
    Teng, Z.
    Young, V. E.
    Graves, M. J.
    Gaunt, M. E.
    Gillard, J. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (01) : 83 - 90