Demographic Characteristics Associated With Perceptions of Personal Utility in Genetic and Genomic Testing: A Systematic Review

被引:6
作者
Miller, Emily G. [1 ]
Young, Jennifer L. [1 ,2 ]
Rao, Anoushka [1 ]
Ward-Lev, Eliana [1 ]
Halley, Meghan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford Ctr Biomed Eth, 300 Pasteur Dr,Edwards Res Bldg,2nd Fl,RmR2DCIR, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Ctr Genet Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
FOCUS GROUP PARTICIPANTS; WHOLE-GENOME; PERCEIVED UTILITY; PARENTS PERCEPTIONS; HUNTINGTON DISEASE; HEREDITARY BREAST; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; OVARIAN-CANCER; EXOME; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10367
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ImportanceThe expansion of genetic and genomic testing in health care has led to recognition that these tests provide personal as well as clinical utility to patients and families. However, available systematic reviews on this topic have not reported the demographic backgrounds of participants in studies of personal utility, leaving generalizability unclear. ObjectiveTo determine the demographic characteristics of participants in studies examining the personal utility of genetic and genomic testing in health care. Evidence ReviewFor this systematic review, we utilized and updated the results of a highly cited 2017 systematic review on the personal utility of genetics and genomics, which identified relevant articles published between January 1, 2003, and August 4, 2016. We also used the original methods to update this bibliography with literature published subsequently up to January 1, 2022. Studies were screened for eligibility by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies reported empirical data on the perspectives of patients, family members, and/or the general public in the US on the personal utility of any type of health-related genetic or genomic test. We utilized a standardized codebook to extract study and participant characteristics. We summarized demographic characteristics descriptively across all studies and by subgroup based on study and participant characteristics. FindingsWe included 52 studies with 13251 eligible participants. Sex or gender was the most frequently reported demographic characteristic (48 studies [92.3%]), followed by race and ethnicity (40 studies [76.9%]), education (38 studies [73.1%]), and income (26 studies [50.0%]). Across studies, participants disproportionately were women or female (mean [SD], 70.8% [20.5%]), were White (mean [SD], 76.1% [22.0%]), had a college degree or higher (mean [SD], 64.5% [19.9%]), and reported income above the US median (mean [SD], 67.4% [19.2%]). Examination of subgroups of results by study and participant characteristics evidenced only small shifts in demographic characteristics. Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review examined the demographic characteristics of individual participants in studies of the personal utility of health-related genetic and genomic testing in the US. The results suggest that participants in these studies were disproportionately White, college-educated women with above-average income. Understanding the perspectives of more diverse individuals regarding the personal utility of genetic and genomic testing may inform barriers to research recruitment and uptake of clinical testing in currently underrepresented populations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium [J].
Amendola, Laura M. ;
Robinson, Jill O. ;
Hart, Ragan ;
Biswas, Sawona ;
Lee, Kaitlyn ;
Bernhardt, Barbara A. ;
East, Kelly ;
Gilmore, Marian J. ;
Kauffman, Tia L. ;
Lewis, Katie L. ;
Roche, Myra ;
Scollon, Sarah ;
Wynn, Julia ;
Blout, Carrie .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2018, 27 (05) :1220-1227
[2]   BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families:: a qualitative study of the BRCA-negative experience [J].
Bakos, Alexis D. ;
Hutson, Sadie P. ;
Loud, Jennifer T. ;
Peters, June A. ;
Giusti, Ruthann M. ;
Greene, Mark H. .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2008, 11 (03) :220-231
[3]   Why is genetic screening for autosomal dominant disorders underused in families? The case of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia [J].
Bernhardt, Barbara A. ;
Zayac, Cara ;
Pyeritz, Reed E. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (09) :812-820
[4]   Parents of newborns in the NICU enrolled in genome sequencing research: hopeful, but not naive [J].
Berrios, Courtney ;
Koertje, Catherine ;
Noel-MacDonnell, Janelle ;
Soden, Sarah ;
Lantos, John .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (02) :416-422
[5]   Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study [J].
Birmingham, Wendy C. ;
Agarwal, Neeraj ;
Kohlmann, Wendy ;
Aspinwall, Lisa G. ;
Wang, Mary ;
Bishoff, Jay ;
Dechet, Christopher ;
Kinney, Anita Y. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 13
[6]   Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study [J].
Bollinger, Juli Murphy ;
Scott, Joan ;
Dvoskin, Rachel ;
Kaufman, David .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) :451-457
[7]   Taking an antiracist posture in scientific publications in human genetics and genomics [J].
Brothers, Kyle B. ;
Bennett, Robin L. ;
Cho, Mildred K. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (06) :1004-1007
[8]   A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants [J].
Cakici, Julie A. ;
Dimmock, David P. ;
Caylor, Sara A. ;
Gaughran, Mary ;
Clarke, Christina ;
Triplett, Cynthia ;
Clark, Michelle M. ;
Kingsmore, Stephen F. ;
Bloss, Cinnamon S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 107 (05) :953-962
[9]   The Effect of Predictive Testing in Adult-Onset Neurodegenerative Diseases on Social and Personal Life [J].
Cohn-Hokke, Petra E. ;
van Swieten, John C. ;
Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L. ;
Tibben, Aad ;
Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne ;
Kievit, Anneke .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2018, 27 (04) :947-954
[10]  
Covidence, About us