Teachers' negotiation of the cross-curricular concept of student digital competence

被引:2
作者
Lofving, Christina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Appl IT, Box 100, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Digital competence; Digital citizenship; Teaching; Sensemaking; Boundary object; EDUCATION; TECHNOLOGY; ICT;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-023-11800-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In a digital society, teachers are required to carry out policy directives on both core knowledge and more vaguely described cross-curricular competences, one being digital competence. This paper reports on the findings of a study in which 41 teachers from three lower secondary schools in Sweden engaged in focus group interviews where they participated in sensemaking processes on students' digital competence. The questions targeted what the teachers knew of their students' digital experiences and how to facilitate and further develop these students' digital competence. Based on the focus group interviews, four themes were identified: critical awareness, tool management, creativity, and avoidance of digital usage. Absent were themes related to democratic digital citizenship. The paper discusses the importance of moving away from a one-sided focus on individual teachers' professional digital competence in favour of focusing on how school organizations can negotiate and facilitate students' digital competence in local situ. Otherwise, there is a risk of overlooking students' cross-curricular digital competence and digital citizenship. This paper is a starting point for further research on how school as an organization can support teachers in facilitating various areas of students' digital competence in a digital society.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1538
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Drawn to distraction: A qualitative study of off-task use of educational technology [J].
Aagaard, Jesper .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 87 :90-97
[2]  
Ala-Mulak K, 2011, 67075 JRC I PROSP TE, P7, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.18046.00322, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.18046.00322]
[3]  
Ananiadou K., 2009, OECD ED WORKING PAPE, V41, DOI DOI 10.1787/218525261154
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Good research practice
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SKR20171847
[6]  
Ball S.J., 2012, SCH DO POLICY POLICY, DOI [10.4324/9780203153185, DOI 10.4324/9780203153185]
[7]   What is Education For? On Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism [J].
Biesta, Gert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2015, 50 (01) :75-87
[8]   In their own words: 41 stories of young people's digital citizenship [J].
Black, Rosalyn ;
Walsh, Lucas ;
Waite, Catherine ;
Collin, Philippa ;
Third, Amanda ;
Idriss, Sherene .
LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 47 (04) :524-536
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
[10]   A Concept Analysis of Digital Citizenship for Democratic Citizenship Education in the Internet Age [J].
Choi, Moonsun .
THEORY AND RESEARCH IN SOCIAL EDUCATION, 2016, 44 (04) :565-607