A lack of focus on data sharing, stakeholders, and economic benefits in current global green infrastructure planning

被引:2
作者
Ruan, Tian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Paavola, Jouni [4 ]
Chan, Faith Ka Shun [5 ,6 ]
Xu, Yaoyang [1 ,3 ]
Baldacchini, Chiara [7 ,8 ]
Calfapietra, Carlo [8 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Urban Environm, Key Lab Urban Environm & Hlth, Ningbo Observat & Res Stn, Xiamen 361021, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] CAS Haixi Ind Technol Innovat Ctr Beilun, Zhejiang Key Lab Urban Environm Proc & Pollut Cont, Ningbo 315830, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Leeds, Ctr Climate Change Econ & Policy CCCEP, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
[5] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Sch Geog Sci, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Leeds, Water Leeds Res Inst, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
[7] Univ Tuscia, Dept Ecol & Biol Sci DEB, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy
[8] Natl Res Council CNR, Inst Res Terr Ecosyst IRET, I-05010 Porano, TR, Italy
关键词
Green infrastructure; Data sharing; Stakeholder; Economic benefits; Research funding; Transformation; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BARRIERS; ADAPTATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119849
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly popular in solving urban environmental challenges and enhancing ecosystem services. Yet the research status and challenges of GI planning have not been comprehensively benchmarked to date. We explored the GI types, actions, goals, and spatiotemporal characteristics of GI planning cases worldwide based on the available literature. The challenges of GI planning were also investigated by the cases included in this manuscript. Additionally, the urban governance solutions to address these challenges were proposed. We found that multi-type GI planning is the most popular. Data sharing, stakeholder participation, economic benefits and research funding for GI planning research were generally inadequate, although they have improved trend over time. Multiple-goal GI planning frequently has higher levels of data sharing, stakeholder participation and economic benefits than GI planning that just takes into account one purpose. We conclude that the future transformation of GI planning requires efficient data sharing mechanisms, effective co-design among stakeholders, systematic business models, and available research funding.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Lack of Cross-Sector and Cross-Level Policy Coherence and Consistency Limits Urban Green Infrastructure Implementation in Malawi
    Afionis, Stavros
    Mkwambisi, David D.
    Dallimer, Martin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8
  • [2] Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Jones, Kristal
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Budden, Amber
    Cox, Michael
    Crosas, Merce
    Game, Edward T.
    Geary, Janis
    Hardy, R. Dean
    Johnson, Jay T.
    Karcher, Sebastian
    Motzer, Nicole
    Pittman, Jeremy
    Randell, Heather
    Silva, Julie A.
    Da Silva, Patricia Pinto
    Strasser, Carly
    Strawhacker, Colleen
    Stuhl, Andrew
    Weber, Nic
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (02) : 81 - 88
  • [3] Assessing four methods for establishing native plants on urban vacant land
    Anderson, Elsa C.
    Minor, Emily S.
    [J]. AMBIO, 2021, 50 (03) : 695 - 705
  • [4] Maintaining natural and traditional cultural green infrastructures across Europe: learning from historic and current landscape transformations
    Angelstam, Per
    Manton, Michael
    Yamelynets, Taras
    Fedoriak, Mariia
    Albulescu, Andra-Cosmina
    Bravo, Felipe
    Cruz, Fatima
    Jaroszewicz, Bogdan
    Kavtarishvili, Marika
    Munoz-Rojas, Jose
    Sijtsma, Frans
    Washbourne, Carla-Leanne
    Agnoletti, Mauro
    Dobrynin, Denis
    Izakovicova, Zita
    Jansson, Nicklas
    Kanka, Robert
    Kopperoinen, Leena
    Lazdinis, Marius
    Metzger, Marc
    van der Moolen, Bert
    Ozut, Deniz
    Gjorgieska, Dori Pavloska
    Stryamets, Natalie
    Tolunay, Ahmet
    Turkoglu, Turkay
    Zagidullina, Asiya
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2021, 36 (02) : 637 - 663
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, Green Infrastructure (GI) - Enhancing Europe's Natural Capital. COM (2013) 249 final
  • [6] Benedict M., 2006, Bibliovault OAI Repository, V22
  • [7] Applying fuzzy logic to open data for sustainable development decision-making: a case study of the planned city Amaravati
    Bick, Ian Avery
    Bardhan, Ronita
    Beaubois, Terry
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 91 (03) : 1317 - 1339
  • [8] Incentives for field hydrology and data sharing: collaboration and compensation: reply to "A need for incentivizing field hydrology, especially in an era of open data"
    Blume, Theresa
    van Meerveld, Ilja
    Weiler, Markus
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2018, 63 (08): : 1266 - 1268
  • [9] Contribution of Urban Forests to the Ecosystem Service of Air Quality in the City of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
    Bonilla-Duarte, Solhanlle
    Caballero Gonzalez, Claudia
    Cortes Rodriguez, Leonardo
    Javier Jauregui-Haza, Ulises
    Garcia-Garcia, Agustin
    [J]. FORESTS, 2021, 12 (09):
  • [10] A global review of ecological fiscal transfers
    Busch, Jonah
    Ring, Irene
    Akullo, Monique
    Amarjargal, Oyut
    Borie, Maud
    Cassola, Rodrigo S.
    Cruz-Trinidad, Annabelle
    Droste, Nils
    Haryanto, Joko Tri
    Kasymov, Ulan
    Kotenko, Nataliia Viktorivna
    Lhkagvadorj, Ariunaa
    De Paulo, Felipe Luiz Lima
    May, Peter H.
    Mukherjee, Anit
    Mumbunan, Sonny
    Santos, Rui
    Tacconi, Luca
    Verde Selva, Gracie
    Verma, Madhu
    Wang, Xiaoxi
    Yu, Lu
    Zhou, Kecen
    [J]. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (09) : 756 - 765