Patients' experiences and perspectives of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A systematic review of qualitative research

被引:5
作者
Rea, Nicola M. A. [1 ,3 ]
Neubeck, Lis [1 ]
Kydonaki, Kalliopi [1 ,2 ]
Mchale, Sheona [1 ]
机构
[1] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Care, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Sch Nursing, Athens 11528, Greece
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Room 1 B 29,9 Sighthill Court,Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, Scotland
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
Critical Illness; Follow-up care; Intensive care units; Qualitative research; Recovery; Thematic analysis; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; CRITICAL ILLNESS; AFTER-DISCHARGE; OF-LIFE; HEALTH; REHABILITATION; MULTIMORBIDITY; INTERVENTIONS; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100168
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Intensive care units deliver care to a heterogeneous group of patients with pre-existing co-morbid disease. Focus has shifted to improving health related quality of life with more patients surviving beyond hospital discharge. Randomised controlled trials evaluating follow-up interventions, to improve physical recovery, have not demonstrated a health-related quality of life benefit. Qualitative research may provide the context to understand the experiences of intensive care survivors during follow-up care addressing physical limitations.Objective: To synthesise qualitative studies and explore Intensive Care survivors' experiences and perspectives of physical symptoms in the context of follow-up care. Setting(s): A systematic search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts, Ovid Nursing and Ovid Emcare) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed primary qualitative studies. No date parameters were applied. Inclusion/exclusion criteria guided the screening process. Participants: The data from eligible primary research studies was extracted into NVivo (v12).Methods: Critical appraisal was completed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke (2022), informed the data synthesis.Results: From 2457 studies, ten relevant studies were included. Two main themes were identified: 1. Recovery as uncertain; which outlines the uncertainty experienced by intensive care unit survivors during recovery. This theme pertained to system-level factors (role of healthcare professional and information provision) which provides the context for delivering follow-up care. 2. Self-determination of recovery; outlines individual characteristics in determining recovery which is conceptualised by patient-level factors (motivation, support network and perception of health).Conclusions: For intensive care survivors, the recovery trajectory is uncertain with a gap in in-formation provision during the acute phase following hospital discharge. Patients' self-determination of recovery is an important consideration to ensure follow-up care addresses the needs of individual patients. The impact of pre-existing co-morbid disease and subgroups of patients deriving benefit from follow-up care remains uncertain.Registration: PROSPERO Registration no. CRD42022355711 Tweetable abstract: Patients' experiences of post-hospital follow-up care to improve physical recovery for intensive care survivors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   From spouse to caregiver and back: a grounded theory study of post-intensive care unit spousal caregiving [J].
Agard, Anne Sophie ;
Egerod, Ingrid ;
Tonnesen, Else ;
Lomborg, Kirsten .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2015, 71 (08) :1892-1903
[2]   The impact of age on intensive care [J].
Akinosoglou, Karolina ;
Schinas, Georgios ;
Almyroudi, Maria Panagiota ;
Gogos, Charalambos ;
Dimopoulos, George .
AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2023, 84
[3]   Meeting the needs of critical care patients after discharge home: a qualitative exploratory study of patient perspectives [J].
Allum, Laura ;
Connolly, Bronwen ;
McKeown, Eamonn .
NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 23 (06) :316-323
[4]  
Aromataris E, 2014, AM J NURS, V114, P53, DOI 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444496.24228.2c
[5]   Patient perspectives on states worse than death: A qualitative study with implications for patient-centered outcomes and values elicitation [J].
Auriemma, Catherine L. ;
O'Donnell, Helen ;
Jones, Julia ;
Barbati, Zoe ;
Akpek, Eda ;
Klaiman, Tamar ;
Halpern, Scott D. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 36 (02) :348-357
[6]   Intensive care discharge summaries for general practice staff: a focus group study [J].
Bench, Suzanne ;
Cornish, Jocelyn ;
Xyrichis, Andreas .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (653) :E904-E912
[7]   Effectiveness of Critical Care Discharge Information in Supporting Early Recovery From Critical Illness [J].
Bench, Suzanne ;
Day, Tina ;
Griffiths, Peter .
CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2013, 33 (03) :41-51
[8]   Reviewing retrieved references for inclusion in systematic reviews using EndNote [J].
Bramer, Wichor M. ;
Milic, Jelena ;
Mast, Frans .
JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2017, 105 (01) :84-87
[9]  
Braun V., 2022, THEMATIC ANAL PRACTI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69909-73470-2
[10]   Recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services following critical illness: an updated UK national cross-sectional survey and progress report [J].
Connolly, Bronwen ;
Milton-Cole, Rhian ;
Adams, Claire ;
Battle, Ceri ;
McPeake, Joanne ;
Quasim, Tara ;
Silversides, Jon ;
Slack, Andrew ;
Waldmann, Carl ;
Wilson, Elizabeth ;
Meyer, Joel .
BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10)