Attention biases the process of risky decision-making: Evidence from eye-tracking

被引:1
作者
Hu, Mengchen [1 ]
Chang, Ruosong [1 ]
Sui, Xue [1 ]
Gao, Min [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Normal Univ, Liaoning Collaborat Innovat Ctr Children & Adolesc, Sch Psychol, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Liaoning Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Dalian 116029, Peoples R China
关键词
attention; evidence accumulation; eye-tracking; risk preference; risky decision-making; DRIFT-DIFFUSION MODEL; VISUAL-ATTENTION; PROSPECT-THEORY; SPATIAL ATTENTION; CHOICE; PREFERENCE; REVERSALS; FIXATIONS; MOVEMENTS; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1002/pchj.724
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Attention determines what kind of option information is processed during risky choices owing to the limitation of visual attention. This paper reviews research on the relationship between higher-complexity risky decision-making and attention as illustrated by eye-tracking to explain the process of risky decision-making by the effect of attention. We demonstrate this process from three stages: the pre-phase guidance of options on attention, the process of attention being biased, and the impact of attention on final risk preference. We conclude that exogenous information can capture attention directly to salient options, thereby altering evidence accumulation. In particular, for multi-attribute risky decision-making, attentional advantages increase the weight of specific attributes, thus biasing risk preference in different directions. We highlight the significance of understanding how people use available information to weigh risks from an information-processing perspective via process data.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
[51]   The power of last fixation: Biasing simple choices by gaze-contingent manipulation [J].
Liu, Hong-Zhi ;
Zhou, Yan-Bang ;
Wei, Zi-Han ;
Jiang, Cheng-Ming .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2020, 208
[52]  
Ludwig J, 2020, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V33, P180, DOI 10.1002/bdm.2152
[53]   PACE Labels on Healthy and Unhealthy Snack Products in a Laboratory Shopping Setting: Perception, Visual Attention, and Product Choice [J].
Mehlhose, Clara ;
Schmitt, Daniel ;
Risius, Antje .
FOODS, 2021, 10 (04)
[54]   A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower [J].
Metcalfe, J ;
Mischel, W .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (01) :3-19
[55]  
Mittone L, 2020, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V15, P371
[56]   Gaze-dependent evidence accumulation predicts multi-alternative risky choice behaviour [J].
Molter, Felix ;
Thomas, Armin ;
Huettel, Scott ;
Heekeren, Hauke ;
Mohr, Peter N. C. .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 18 (07)
[57]   Does Attention Increase the Value of Choice Alternatives? [J].
Mormann, Milica ;
Russo, J. Edward .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (04) :305-315
[58]   Eye-tracking research on sensory and consumer science: A review, pitfalls and future directions [J].
Motoki, Kosuke ;
Saito, Toshiki ;
Onuma, Takuya .
FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 145
[59]   Excited and Aroused: The Predictive Importance of Simple Choice Process Metrics [J].
Mueller, Steffen Q. ;
Ring, Patrick ;
Fischer, Maria .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE PSYCHOLOGY AND ECONOMICS, 2022, 15 (01) :31-53
[60]   A Dual System Model of Preferences Under Risk [J].
Mukherjee, Kanchan .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 117 (01) :243-255