Attention biases the process of risky decision-making: Evidence from eye-tracking

被引:1
作者
Hu, Mengchen [1 ]
Chang, Ruosong [1 ]
Sui, Xue [1 ]
Gao, Min [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Normal Univ, Liaoning Collaborat Innovat Ctr Children & Adolesc, Sch Psychol, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Liaoning Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Dalian 116029, Peoples R China
关键词
attention; evidence accumulation; eye-tracking; risk preference; risky decision-making; DRIFT-DIFFUSION MODEL; VISUAL-ATTENTION; PROSPECT-THEORY; SPATIAL ATTENTION; CHOICE; PREFERENCE; REVERSALS; FIXATIONS; MOVEMENTS; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1002/pchj.724
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Attention determines what kind of option information is processed during risky choices owing to the limitation of visual attention. This paper reviews research on the relationship between higher-complexity risky decision-making and attention as illustrated by eye-tracking to explain the process of risky decision-making by the effect of attention. We demonstrate this process from three stages: the pre-phase guidance of options on attention, the process of attention being biased, and the impact of attention on final risk preference. We conclude that exogenous information can capture attention directly to salient options, thereby altering evidence accumulation. In particular, for multi-attribute risky decision-making, attentional advantages increase the weight of specific attributes, thus biasing risk preference in different directions. We highlight the significance of understanding how people use available information to weigh risks from an information-processing perspective via process data.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
[11]   How does reward compete with goal-directed and stimulus-driven shifts of attention? [J].
Bourgeois, Alexia ;
Neveu, Remi ;
Bayle, Dimitri J. ;
Vuilleumier, Patrik .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2017, 31 (01) :109-118
[12]   Attention in risky choice [J].
Brandstaetter, Eduard ;
Koerner, Christof .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 152 :166-176
[13]   Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice [J].
Cherkasova, Mariya V. ;
Clark, Luke ;
Barton, Jason J. S. ;
Schulzer, Michael ;
Shafiee, Mahsa ;
Kingstone, Alan ;
Stoessl, A. Jon ;
Winstanley, Catharine A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 38 (48) :10362-10370
[14]   Loss Aversion Reflects Information Accumulation, Not Bias: A Drift-Diffusion Model Study. [J].
Clay, Summer N. ;
Clithero, John A. ;
Harris, Alison M. ;
Reed, Catherine L. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
[15]   Common and distinct neural correlates of intertemporal and risky decision-making: Meta-analytical evidence for the dual-system theory [J].
Cui, Lidan ;
Ye, Meng ;
Sun, Lingyun ;
Zhang, Shunmin ;
He, Guibing .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2022, 141
[16]  
Dambacher M, 2016, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V11, P223
[17]   Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain [J].
De Martino, Benedetto ;
Kumaran, Dharshan ;
Seymour, Ben ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5787) :684-687
[18]   Contextual factors modulate risk preferences in adult humans [J].
De Petrillo, Francesca ;
Paoletti, Melania ;
Bellagamba, Francesca ;
Manzi, Giorgio ;
Paglieri, Fabio ;
Addessi, Elsa .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2020, 176
[19]  
Duerrschmid K., 2018, Methods in consumer research: Alternative approaches and special applications, V2, P279, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-101743-2.00012-1
[20]   Comparing perceptual and preferential decision making [J].
Dutilh, Gilles ;
Rieskamp, Jorg .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2016, 23 (03) :723-737