Attention biases the process of risky decision-making: Evidence from eye-tracking

被引:1
作者
Hu, Mengchen [1 ]
Chang, Ruosong [1 ]
Sui, Xue [1 ]
Gao, Min [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Liaoning Normal Univ, Liaoning Collaborat Innovat Ctr Children & Adolesc, Sch Psychol, Dalian, Peoples R China
[2] Liaoning Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Dalian 116029, Peoples R China
关键词
attention; evidence accumulation; eye-tracking; risk preference; risky decision-making; DRIFT-DIFFUSION MODEL; VISUAL-ATTENTION; PROSPECT-THEORY; SPATIAL ATTENTION; CHOICE; PREFERENCE; REVERSALS; FIXATIONS; MOVEMENTS; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.1002/pchj.724
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Attention determines what kind of option information is processed during risky choices owing to the limitation of visual attention. This paper reviews research on the relationship between higher-complexity risky decision-making and attention as illustrated by eye-tracking to explain the process of risky decision-making by the effect of attention. We demonstrate this process from three stages: the pre-phase guidance of options on attention, the process of attention being biased, and the impact of attention on final risk preference. We conclude that exogenous information can capture attention directly to salient options, thereby altering evidence accumulation. In particular, for multi-attribute risky decision-making, attentional advantages increase the weight of specific attributes, thus biasing risk preference in different directions. We highlight the significance of understanding how people use available information to weigh risks from an information-processing perspective via process data.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 165
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Attention and salience in preference reversals [J].
Alos-Ferrer, Carlos ;
Ritschel, Alexander .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (03) :1024-1051
[2]  
Alós-Ferrer C, 2021, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V16, P57
[3]   Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)
[4]   The Consistency of Visual Attention to Losses and Loss Sensitivity Across Valuation and Choice [J].
Ashby, Nathaniel J. S. ;
Yechiam, Eldad ;
Ben-Eliezer, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2018, 147 (12) :1791-1809
[5]   Finding the Right Fit: A Comparison of Process Assumptions Underlying Popular Drift-Diffusion Models [J].
Ashby, Nathaniel J. S. ;
Jekel, Marc ;
Dickert, Stephan ;
Gloeckner, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2016, 42 (12) :1982-1993
[6]   Applications and Innovations of Eye-movement Research in Judgment and Decision Making [J].
Ashby, Nathaniel J. S. ;
Johnson, Joseph G. ;
Krajbich, Ian ;
Wedel, Michel .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 29 (2-3) :96-102
[7]   Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy [J].
Awh, Edward ;
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) :437-443
[8]   Consumer preferences for nutritional claims: An exploration of attention and choice based on an eye-tracking choice experiment [J].
Ballco, Petjon ;
de-Magistris, Tiziana ;
Caputo, Vincenzina .
FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 116 :37-48
[9]   Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation [J].
Barrafrem, Kinga ;
Hausfeld, Jan .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 77
[10]   Influence of reward learning on visual attention and eye movements in a naturalistic environment: A virtual reality study [J].
Bourgeois, Alexia ;
Badier, Emmanuel ;
Baron, Naem ;
Carruzzo, Fabien ;
Vuilleumier, Patrik .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12)