Learning to empathize with users through design thinking in hybrid mode: Insights from two educational case studies

被引:3
作者
Levy, Meira [1 ,2 ]
Hadar, Irit [2 ]
机构
[1] Shenkar Coll Engn Design & Art, Sch Ind Engn & Management, Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Dept Informat Syst, Haifa, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Requirements engineering; Empathy; Design thinking (DT); Education; Hybrid work; Web platform; SYSTEMS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2023.111831
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
COVID-19 has imposed new educational challenges, including the need to prepare students to the new era of hybrid work. This research aimed to shed new light on the manner in which students learn and practice hybrid work in educational settings. To this end, two educational studies were performed, for examining students practicing design thinking (DT) in hybrid mode and the development of their empathy skills during this expe-rience. The main case study was conducted in an academic hackathon-like course, where students addressed loneliness-related challenges during four full days using a configured web platform. In a follow-up case study, the adaptability of this approach to small-scale settings of a 90-minute DT workshop was explored. The students filled in questionnaires, which examined their empathy development in three dimensions: Skill, Orientation, and Being. The findings show the benefits of the web platform and the extent to which these academic educational programs fostered empathy and innovation and highlights the challenges, opportunities, and benefits of fostering new educational programs that allow hybrid participation, involving external stakeholders, and guide the stu-dents to handle real challenges. Such hybrid academic programs can prepare students for the hybrid, multi-disciplinary work reality towards developing human-centered solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Definition of Indicators in the Execution of Educational Projects with Design Thinking Using the Systematic Literature Review
    Almeida, Frederico Viana
    Canedo, Edna Dias
    da Costa, Ruyther Parente
    [J]. 2019 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2019), 2019,
  • [2] Benito A., 2021, Higher Learning Research Communications, V11, P51, DOI [10.18870/hlrc.v11i.1195, 10.18870/hlrc.v11i0.1195, DOI 10.18870/HLRC.V11I0.1195, DOI 10.5590/10.18870/HLRC.V11I0.1195]
  • [3] Bolshakova Yulia, 2022, 2022 31st Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)., P21, DOI 10.23919/FRUCT54823.2022.9770898
  • [4] A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment
    Brandt, Carol B.
    Cennamo, Katherine
    Douglas, Sarah
    Vernon, Mitzi
    McGrath, Margarita
    Reimer, Yolanda
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2013, 23 (02) : 329 - 348
  • [5] Brenner W., 2016, Design thinking for innovation: Research and practice
  • [6] Brown T, 2008, HARVARD BUS REV, V86, P84
  • [7] Transformative Sustainability Pedagogy: Learning From Ecological Systems and Indigenous Wisdom
    Burns, Heather L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSFORMATIVE EDUCATION, 2015, 13 (03) : 259 - 276
  • [8] Carroll M., 2015, J RES STEM ED, V1, P59, DOI [DOI 10.51355/JSTEM.2015.9, 10.51355/jstem.2015.9]
  • [9] Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?
    Cech, Erin A.
    [J]. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2014, 39 (01) : 42 - 72
  • [10] Chen X., 2021, DEStech Trans. Econ. Bus. Manage., P1