Why use or forgo formal and informal appropriation mechanisms? A qualitative study of sustainable innovations from small- and medium-sized enterprises

被引:2
作者
Morales, Pablo [1 ,3 ]
Flikkema, Meindert [1 ]
Castaldi, Carolina [2 ]
de Man, Ard-Pieter [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Management & Org, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Sch Business & Econ, Dept Management & Org, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
appropriation; patents; sustainable innovation; trademarks; FIRMS CAPTURE VALUE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PRODUCT; TRADEMARK; APPROPRIABILITY; STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE; INSIGHTS; MOTIVES; PROTECT;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3582
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The role that appropriation mechanisms such as patents and secrecy play in sustainable innovation is currently being debated. In particular, we lack an understanding of the different motives behind using or forgoing specific appropriation mechanisms. Current knowledge is mainly derived from the general innovation literature, which emphasizes profiting from innovation. However, sustainable innovators also seek to positively impact the environment and society, which raises the question of whether existing appropriation literature also applies to sustainable innovation. We interviewed 42 business leaders from small-to-medium-sized enterprises concerning a recently commercialized sustainable innovation. The results indicate that known motives from the general innovation literature apply to sustainable innovation but also reveal motives specific to sustainable innovation. We also discovered motives suitable to all innovations, such as non-disclosure agreement motives extending beyond achieving secrecy. Theoretically, our findings suggest the profiting from innovation framework may also apply to sustainable innovation, even though the pursuit of profits is not the only motive of sustainable innovators. In practical terms, the results help sustainable innovators to craft an appropriation strategy, and policy-related opportunities arise for improving patent and trademark filing experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:1937 / 1961
页数:25
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Afeltra G., 2021, EUR J INNOV MANAG, V28, P1556, DOI [10.1108/IJEBR-10-2021-0799, DOI 10.1108/IJEBR-10-2021-0799]
[2]  
[Anonymous], Patents
[3]   The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation [J].
Arundel, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (04) :611-624
[4]   Why do innovators not apply for trademarks? The role of information asymmetries and collaborative innovation [J].
Athreye, Suma ;
Fassio, Claudio .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (1-2) :134-154
[5]   Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany [J].
Blind, K ;
Edler, J ;
Frietsch, R ;
Schmoch, U .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (05) :655-672
[6]  
Blind K., 2003, Patents in the service industries: Final report
[7]   Why do SMEs file trademarks? Insights from firms in innovative industries [J].
Block, Joern H. ;
Fisch, Christian O. ;
Hahn, Alexander ;
Sandner, Philipp G. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (10) :1915-1930
[8]   A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes [J].
Bocken, N. M. P. ;
Short, S. W. ;
Rana, P. ;
Evans, S. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 65 :42-56
[9]   Corporate Sustainability and Innovation in SMEs: Evidence of Themes and Activities in Practice [J].
Bos-Brouwers, Hilke Elke Jacke .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 19 (07) :417-435
[10]   Citizens and cities: Leveraging citizen science and big data for sustainable urban development [J].
Cappa, Francesco ;
Franco, Stefano ;
Rosso, Federica .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (02) :648-667