Prediction of sugar beet yield and quality parameters with varying nitrogen fertilization using ensemble decision trees and artificial neural networks

被引:20
作者
Varga, Ivana [1 ]
Radocaj, Dorijan [2 ]
Jurisic, Mladen [2 ]
Markulj Kulundzic, Antonela [3 ]
Antunovic, Manda [1 ]
机构
[1] Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Fac Agrobiotech Sci Osijek, Dept Plant Prod & Biotechnol, Vladimira Preloga 1, Osijek 31000, Croatia
[2] Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ Osijek, Fac Agrobiotech Sci Osijek, Dept Agr Engn & Renewable Energy Sources, Vladimira Preloga 1, Osijek 31000, Croatia
[3] Agr Inst Osijek, Dept Breeding & Genet Ind Plants, Juzno Predgrade 17, Osijek 31000, Croatia
关键词
Sugar beet root yield; Leaf samples; Precipitation; Machine learning; Accuracy assessment; BETA-VULGARIS L; CROP;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2023.108076
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Nitrogen fertilization has a crucial role in sugar beet production, especially concerning root yield and quality. This study employed a machine learning approach to predict root yield and quality parameters based on the nutrient status of sugar beet leaves in relation to nitrogen fertilization. The field experiment included the following N fertilization treatments for sugar beet production: control (N0), presowing (N1 = 45 kg N ha-1) and presowing with top-dressing (N2 = 99 and 154.5 kg ha-1). Leaf samples were collected during the vegetation period in six intervals (May-Sept) to determine the levels of N, K and Na in the leaf dry matter. The machine learning regression based on ensemble decision trees and artificial neural network was used to determine the relationship of leaf samples based on varying N fertilization with yield parameters. Among the leaf elements analyzed, Na exhibited the highest average relative variable importance for root yield, sucrose content, and other quality parameters during the season with greater precipitation. In the season with less precipitation, N content at the beginning of July showed higher importance on root yield (74.6). The evaluated machine learning methods consistently achieved high accuracy across various combinations of input data and yield parameters, with a median R2 of 0.927 and a range from 0.842 to 0.998.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gradient-based training and pruning of radial basis function networks with an application in materials physics
    Maatta, Jussi
    Bazaliy, Viacheslav
    Kimari, Jyri
    Djurabekova, Flyura
    Nordlund, Kai
    Roos, Teemu
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 2021, 133 : 123 - 131
  • [32] Nitrogen compounds in organs of two sugar beet genotypes (Beta vulgaris L.) during the season
    Maeck, Gisela
    Hoffmann, Christa M.
    Maerlaender, Bernward
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2007, 102 (03) : 210 - 218
  • [33] Organ-specific adaptation to low precipitation in solute concentration of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)
    Maeck, Gisela
    Hoffmann, Christa M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2006, 25 (03) : 270 - 279
  • [34] Monitoring the Foliar Nutrients Status of Mango Using Spectroscopy-Based Spectral Indices and PLSR-Combined Machine Learning Models
    Mahajan, Gopal Ramdas
    Das, Bappa
    Murgaokar, Dayesh
    Herrmann, Ittai
    Berger, Katja
    Sahoo, Rabi N.
    Patel, Kiran
    Desai, Ashwini
    Morajkar, Shaiesh
    Kulkarni, Rahul M.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 24
  • [35] Interpretable machine learning methods to explain on-farm yield variability of high productivity wheat in Northwest India
    Nayak, Hari Sankar
    Silva, Joao Vasco
    Parihar, Chiter Mal
    Krupnik, Timothy J.
    Sena, Dipaka Ranjan
    Kakraliya, Suresh K.
    Jat, Hanuman Sahay
    Sidhu, Harminder Singh
    Sharma, Parbodh C.
    Jat, Mangi Lal
    Sapkota, Tek B.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2022, 287
  • [36] Pavlù K, 2021, LISTY CUKROV REPAR, V137, P245
  • [37] Soya Yield Prediction on a Within-Field Scale Using Machine Learning Models Trained on Sentinel-2 and Soil Data
    Pejak, Branislav
    Lugonja, Predrag
    Antic, Aleksandar
    Panic, Marko
    Pandzic, Milos
    Alexakis, Emmanouil
    Mavrepis, Philip
    Zhou, Naweiluo
    Marko, Oskar
    Crnojevic, Vladimir
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [38] Pevalek-Kozlina B., 2003, Fiziologija bilja
  • [39] Pospisil M., 2013, ZRINSKI DD C AKOVEC
  • [40] Pulkrábek J, 2021, LISTY CUKROV REPAR, V137, P184