Factors Affecting Day-to-Day Variations in Tacrolimus Concentration among Children and Young Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Tacrolimus is widely used as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). It has a narrow therapeutic index range; high tacrolimus concentrations are associated with toxicity, whereas low concentrations are associated with an increased risk of GVHD. Although dose adjustments based on ther-apeutic drug monitoring are performed, unexpected large variations in tacrolimus concentration are sometimes encountered. The available evidence suggests that the factors affecting tacrolimus concentration are not fully under-stood. This study was aimed primarily at investigating the factors affecting day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concen-tration in children and young adults who received continuous tacrolimus infusion after allo-HSCT. The secondary objective was to identify the factors causing large variations (>20%) in tacrolimus concentrations. This retrospective cohort study comprised 123 consecutive pediatric and young adult patients (age <25 years) who received continuous i.v. tacrolimus infusion after allo-HSCT at Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan, between January 2009 and December 2021. To compare day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concentration without consideration of the tacroli-mus dose, 2 consecutive days when the tacrolimus dose was not changed were selected from between the first post-allo-HSCT day of a tacrolimus concentration >7 ng/mL and day 28 post-allo-HSCT. Subsequently, information for the subsequent 24 hours was collected along with the tacrolimus concentrations and hematocrit values. Tacrolimus con-centration was determined using whole blood samples. Tacrolimus concentrations were significantly higher in patients who received red blood cell concentrate (RCC) transfusions (P < .0001) and methotrexate (P = .0162), patients with persistent fever (P = .0056), and patients with a decline in fever (P = .0003). In contrast, tacrolimus concentrations were significantly lower in patients who received platelet concentrate (PC) transfusions (P < .0001), who redeveloped fever (P = .0261), and who had a replaced tacrolimus administration route set (P = .0008). Variations in tacrolimus concentration were significantly correlated with variations in hematocrit (r = .556; P < .0001). Body weight (P < .0001), RCC transfusion (P < .0001), methotrexate use (P = .0333), persistent fever (P = .0150), and decline in fever (P = .0073) were associated with a sharp increase in tacrolimus concentration. In contrast, body weight (P < .0001), PC transfusion (P = .0025), and replacement of the tacrolimus administration route set (P = .0025) were associated with a sharp decrease in tacrolimus concentration. RCC and PC transfusions, fever, methotrexate administration, and replacement of the tacrolimus administration route set were independent factors affecting day-to-day variations in tacrolimus concentration. In addition to these factors, low body weight was a risk factor for both sharp increases and decreases in tacrolimus concentration. These findings suggest the need for better control of tacrolimus concentration using whole blood samples.