Criterion and construct validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) to measure depression in patients with cancer: The contribution of somatic items

被引:15
作者
Almeida, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Camacho, Marta [1 ,6 ]
Barahona-Correa, J. Bernardo [1 ,3 ]
Oliveira, Jose [1 ,3 ]
Lemos, Raquel [1 ,4 ]
da Silva, Daniel Rodrigues [1 ]
da Silva, Joaquim Alves [1 ,3 ]
Baptista, Telmo Mourinho [5 ]
Gracio, Jaime [1 ,3 ]
Oliveira-Maia, Albino J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Champalimaud Fdn, Champalimaud Res & Clin Ctr, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Grad Programme Clin & Hlth Psychol, Fac Psicol, Lisbon, Portugal
[3] Univ Nova Lisboa, NOVA Med Sch, Lisbon, Portugal
[4] ISPA Inst Univ Ciencias Psicol Sociais & Vida, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Univ Lisbon, Fac Psicol, Lisbon, Portugal
[6] Univ Cambridge, Jon Van Geest Ctr Brain, Repair, Cambridge, England
关键词
Depression; Cancer; BDI-II; Psychometry; Assessment; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; FIT INDEXES; CARE; METAANALYSIS; VALIDATION; INTERVIEW; SYMPTOMS; ANXIETY; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100350
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background/Objective: Screening for depression in patients with cancer can be difficult due to overlap between symptoms of depression and cancer. We assessed validity of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) in this population.Method: Data was obtained in an outpatient neuropsychiatry unit treating patients with and without cancer. Psy-chometric properties of the BDI-II Portuguese version were assessed separately in 202 patients with cancer, and 376 outpatients with mental health complaints but without cancer.Results: Confirmatory factor analysis suggested a three-factor structure model (cognitive, affective and somatic) provided best fit to data in both samples. Criterion validity was good for detecting depression in oncological patients, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.91). A cut-off score of 14 had sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 73%. Excluding somatic items did not significantly change the ROC curve for BDI-II (difference AUCs = 0.002, p=0.9). A good criterion validity for BDI-II was also obtained in the non-oncological population (AUC = 0.87; 95% CI 0.81-0.91), with a cut-off of 18 (sensitivity=84%; specificity=73%).Conclusions: The BDI-II demonstrated good psychometric properties in patients with cancer, comparable to a pop-ulation without cancer. Exclusion of somatic items did not affect screening accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890423349
[2]  
Amorim Patricia, 2000, Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, V22, P106
[3]   Screening, Assessment, and Care of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adults With Cancer: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Adaptation [J].
Andersen, Barbara L. ;
DeRubeis, Robert J. ;
Berman, Barry S. ;
Gruman, Jessie ;
Champion, Victoria L. ;
Massie, Mary Jane ;
Holland, Jimmie C. ;
Partridge, Ann H. ;
Bak, Kate ;
Somerfield, Mark R. ;
Rowland, Julia H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15) :1605-U118
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IMPR SUPP PALL CAR A
[5]  
Arbuckle J. L., 2009, Amos 18 user's guide
[6]   Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II with primary care medical patients [J].
Arnau, RC ;
Meagher, MW ;
Norris, MP ;
Bramson, R .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 20 (02) :112-119
[7]  
Beck A., 2002, BDI-II-NL handleiding: De Nederlandse versie van de Beck depression inventory
[8]  
Beck A. T., 1996, Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II
[9]  
BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[10]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588