Advances in automatic identification of road subsurface distress using ground penetrating radar: State of the art and future trends

被引:21
作者
Liu, Chenglong [1 ]
Du, Yuchuan [1 ]
Yue, Guanghua [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yishun [1 ]
Wu, Difei [1 ]
Li, Feng [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Rd & Traff Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai DeepWays Transportat Technol Co Ltd, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
[3] Beihang Univ, Sch Transportat Sci & Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
Road subsurface distress detection; GPR; Automatic identification; Machine learning; Deep learning; GPR DATA; NEURAL-NETWORK; LANDMINE DETECTION; CONCEALED CRACKS; CLASSIFICATION; RECONSTRUCTION; VISUALIZATION; REINFORCEMENT; RECOGNITION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105185
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Affected by soil erosion and material deterioration, road subsurface is prone to distress such as cavities, water-rich, and cracks. Ground penetrating radar (GPR), as a real-time geophysical survey method that uses electromagnetic radiation to image the subsurface, offers promising non-destructive solutions to road subsurface health monitoring. However, the interpretation of GPR signals is non-intuitive and obscure in terms of distress identification, whose performance is also limited by the heterogeneous road condition. In conjunction with knowledge diagram analysis, a state-of-the-art review is applied to summarize the advances in the automatic identification of road subsurface distress (RSD). The algorithms based on the single-channel waveform (A-scan), two-dimensional profile (B-scan), and three-dimensional data (C-scan) are elaborated from the perspectives of rule-based recognition algorithm, machine learning algorithm, and deep learning algorithm. In comparison to analytical methods, the emerging deep learning models have a powerful ability to extract complex features from multi-dimensional GPR radargrams, enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of road subsurface distress detection. Recommendations for model selection are compiled from existing literature together with empirical evidence. The most significant variables that influence the model selections are thought to be the type of identified RSD, training sample quality and quantity, prior knowledge, and computational cost. Some challenges, such as insufficient training samples and diverse road structures, are presented. Future trends are concluded to draw the implications for GPR research.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [1] Fractals and Independent Component Analysis for Defect Detection in Bridge Decks
    Abdel-Qader, Ikhlas
    Abu-Amara, Fadi
    Abudayyeh, Osama
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, 2011
  • [2] Corrosiveness mapping of bridge decks using image-based analysis of GPR data
    Abouhamad, Mona
    Dawood, Thikra
    Jabri, Ahmad
    Alsharqawi, Mohammed
    Zayed, Tarek
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 80 : 104 - 117
  • [3] Abujarad F, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GROUND PENETRATING RADAR (GPR 2014), P989, DOI 10.1109/ICGPR.2014.6970574
  • [4] Estimating geometrical parameters of cylindrical targets detected by ground-penetrating radar using template matching algorithm
    Ahmadi, Reza
    Fathianpour, Nader
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 10 (06)
  • [5] Rebar detection and localization for bridge deck inspection and evaluation using deep residual networks
    Ahmed, Habib
    La, Hung Manh
    Tran, Khiem
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 120
  • [6] Automatic detection of buried utilities and solid objects with GPR using neural networks and pattern recognition
    Al-Nuaimy, W
    Huang, Y
    Nakhkash, M
    Fang, MTC
    Nguyen, VT
    Eriksen, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2000, 43 (2-4) : 157 - 165
  • [7] Ali Hasimah, 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V705, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/705/1/012046
  • [8] An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections
    Benedetto, Andrea
    Tosti, Fabio
    Ciampoli, Luca Bianchini
    D'Amico, Fabrizio
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2017, 132 : 201 - 209
  • [9] Blind deconvolution via sparsity maximization applied to GPR data
    Chahine, Khaled
    Baltazart, Vincent
    Wang, Yide
    Derobert, Xavier
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, 15 (04) : 575 - 586
  • [10] IMPULSE RADAR EVALUATION OF ASPHALT-COVERED BRIDGE DECKS
    CHUNG, T
    CARTER, CR
    MASLIWEC, T
    MANNING, DG
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1992, 28 (01) : 125 - 137