Axial bearing capacity and ductility of seawater sea sand coral aggregate concrete (SSCC) columns reinforced with hybrid GFRP and corrosion resistant rebars

被引:7
作者
Cao, Qi [1 ]
Li, Xiaowei [1 ]
Wu, Zhimin [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture Engn, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Seawater sea sand coral aggregate concrete; GFRP; Corrosion resistant; Axial compression; Ductility; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105396
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The shortage of fresh water and river sand resources and steel corrosion are becoming increasingly prominent in engineering construction. Seawater sea sand coral aggregate concrete (SSCC) and corrosion resistant rein-forcement are promising materials in replacement of conventional concrete and steel in building structures in island and reef construction. This study investigated the axial compression performance of GFRP (glass fiber reinforced polymer) and corrosion resistant rebars hybrid reinforced seawater sea sand coral aggregate concrete columns. A total of eighteen short columns were tested for axial compression performance, including three reinforcement ratios (1.01%, 1.56%, 2.26%) and 5 reinforcement types (pure GFRP reinforcement or G, pure stainless steel reinforcement or S, pure epoxy coated steel rebar (ECSB) reinforcement or E, GFRP-stainless steel reinforcement or GS and GFRP-ECSB or GE). The failure modes of the column are recorded and analyzed, and the axial bearing capacity and ductility are calculated and analyzed. Results show that the bearing capacity of columns is positively correlated with the reinforcement ratio. Generally, the bearing capacity of S-SSCC column and E-SSCC column are not significant different, but both are larger than that of G-SSCC column. The bearing capacity of hybrid reinforcement GS-SSCC and GE-SSCC column is between S-SSCC column and G-SSCC column. Meanwhile, it indicates that the theoretical calculation results of bearing capacity agree well with the experi-mental results. The ductility analytical results exhibit that the studied column specimens have the highest ductility when the reinforcement ratio is 1.56%. Among different reinforcement types, the ductility of G-SSCC is the smallest and the GE-SSCC and GS-SSCC column show improved ductility compared with G-SSCC columns.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Axial Capacity of Circular Concrete Columns Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Spirals [J].
Afifi, Mohammad Z. ;
Mohamed, Hamdy M. ;
Benmokrane, Brahim .
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 18 (01)
[2]  
American Concrete Institute (ACI) Commitee 440, 2015, GUID DES CONSTR CONC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Doboku gakkai ronbunshuu E
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, JGJ55-2011. Specification for mix proportion design of ordinary concrete S
[5]   Mechanical properties and corrosion behaviour of stainless steel reinforcing bars [J].
Castro, H ;
Rodriguez, C ;
Belzunce, FJ ;
Canteli, AF .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 143 :134-137
[6]  
Chen S, 2021, Journal of Composite Materials, V38, P3519
[7]  
Chen Z., 2019, Silicate Bulletin, V38, P3934
[8]  
CS (Chinese Standard), 2013, GB/T 30022-2013
[9]  
CS (Chinese Standard), 2010, GBT 228.1-2010
[10]  
CSA, 2012, CSA S806-12