Ultrasound LI-RADS Visualization Scores on Surveillance Ultrasound for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Kang, Ji Hun [1 ]
Kim, Nam Hee [2 ]
Kim, Dong Hwan [3 ,6 ]
Choi, Yangsean [4 ,5 ]
Choi, Joon-Il [3 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Guri Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Guri, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Kangbuk Samsung Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med,Div Gastroenterol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Univ Ulsan Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul St, 222 Banpo-daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Early detection of cancer; Ultrasonography; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; ASSOCIATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.07.008
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the proportions of each surveillance ultra-sound (US) visualization score for hepatocellular carcinoma based on the US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and to identify the factors associated with visualization score C. Original publications reporting US LI-RADS visualization scores were identified in MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1, 2017, to November 25, 2022. The meta-analytic pooled proportion of each visualization score based on US examination was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Subgroup meta-regression analyses were performed to explore study heterogeneity. US LI-RADS visualization scores were reported from a total of 25,698 US examinations across 12 studies. The pooled proportions of visualization scores A, B and C were 56.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.6-73.2%, I-2 = 99.2%), 30.3% (95% CI: 21.5-40.7%, I-2 = 98.8%) and 6.9% (95% CI: 3.9 -11.7%, I-2 = 97.7%), respectively. Significantly higher proportions of visualization score C were found in studies that exclusively enrolled cirrhosis patients and a study in which the disease etiology was non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (p < 0.05). In addition, the pooled proportion of visualization score C was higher in studies with a mean or median body mass index >25 kg/m(2) (10.7%, 95% CI: 4.3-24.3%). In conclusion, a substantial proportion of surveillance US examinations exhibited moderate to severe limitations on visualization. There was a tendency toward higher proportions of US LI-RADS visualization score C in patients with cirrhosis, NAFLD and obesity.
引用
收藏
页码:2205 / 2212
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [41] Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials
    Wittes, J
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2002, 24 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [42] A Comparison of Biannual Two-Phase Low-Dose Liver CT and US for HCC Surveillance in a Group at High Risk of HCC Development
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Joo, Ijin
    Jeon, Ju Hyun
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kim, Seung-taek
    Cho, Eun Ju
    Lee, Jeong-Hoon
    Yu, Su Jong
    Kim, Yoon Jun
    Yoon, Jung-Hwan
    [J]. LIVER CANCER, 2020, 9 (05) : 503 - 517