Embedding communication concepts in forecasting training increases students' understanding of ecological uncertainty

被引:3
作者
Woelmer, Whitney M. [1 ]
Moore, Tadhg N. [1 ,2 ]
Lofton, Mary E. [1 ]
Thomas, R. Quinn [1 ,2 ]
Carey, Cayelan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Biol Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Forest Resources & Environm Conservat, Blacksburg, VA USA
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2023年 / 14卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
active learning; ecological forecast; ecology education; Macrosystems EDDIE; R Shiny; teaching modules; translational ecology; undergraduate curricula; visualization literacy; DECISION-MAKING; VISUALIZATION; SCIENCE; IMPACT; OPPORTUNITIES; MANAGEMENT; RISKS; SHINY; WORTH; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.4628
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Communicating and interpreting uncertainty in ecological model predictions is notoriously challenging, motivating the need for new educational tools, which introduce ecology students to core concepts in uncertainty communication. Ecological forecasting, an emerging approach to estimate future states of ecological systems with uncertainty, provides a relevant and engaging framework for introducing uncertainty communication to undergraduate students, as forecasts can be used as decision support tools for addressing real-world ecological problems and are inherently uncertain. To provide critical training on uncertainty communication and introduce undergraduate students to the use of ecological forecasts for guiding decision-making, we developed a hands-on teaching module within the Macrosystems Environmental Data-Driven Inquiry and Exploration (EDDIE; ) educational program. Our module used an active learning approach by embedding forecasting activities in an R Shiny application to engage ecology students in introductory data science, ecological modeling, and forecasting concepts without needing advanced computational or programming skills. Pre- and post-module assessment data from more than 250 undergraduate students enrolled in ecology, freshwater ecology, and zoology courses indicate that the module significantly increased students' ability to interpret forecast visualizations with uncertainty, identify different ways to communicate forecast uncertainty for diverse users, and correctly define ecological forecasting terms. Specifically, students were more likely to describe visual, numeric, and probabilistic methods of uncertainty communication following module completion. Students were also able to identify more benefits of ecological forecasting following module completion, with the key benefits of using forecasts for prediction and decision-making most commonly described. These results show promise for introducing ecological model uncertainty, data visualizations, and forecasting into undergraduate ecology curricula via software-based learning, which can increase students' ability to engage and understand complex ecological concepts.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 101 条
[21]  
Chang W., 2022, shiny: web application framework
[22]   Evaluating the impact of visualization of wildfire hazard upon decision-making under uncertainty [J].
Cheong, Lisa ;
Bleisch, Susanne ;
Kealy, Allison ;
Tolhurst, Kevin ;
Wilkening, Tom ;
Duckham, Matt .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2016, 30 (07) :1377-1404
[23]   Making ecology relevant to decision making: the human-centered, place-based approach [J].
Cid, Carmen R. ;
Pouyat, Richard V. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (08) :447-448
[24]  
Clemen R., 2004, MAKING HARD DECISION, V1 st
[25]   Value-Suppressing Uncertainty Palettes [J].
Correll, Michael ;
Moritz, Dominik ;
Heer, Jeffrey .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
[26]   Critical research needs for managing coral reef marine protected areas: Perspectives of academics and managers [J].
Cvitanovic, C. ;
Wilson, S. K. ;
Fulton, C. J. ;
Almany, G. R. ;
Anderson, P. ;
Babcock, R. C. ;
Ban, N. C. ;
Beeden, R. J. ;
Beger, M. ;
Cinner, J. ;
Dobbs, K. ;
Evans, L. S. ;
Farnham, A. ;
Friedman, K. J. ;
Gale, K. ;
Gladstone, W. ;
Grafton, Q. ;
Graham, N. A. J. ;
Gudge, S. ;
Harrison, P. L. ;
Holmes, T. H. ;
Johnstone, N. ;
Jones, G. P. ;
Jordan, A. ;
Kendrick, A. J. ;
Klein, C. J. ;
Little, L. R. ;
Malcolm, H. A. ;
Morris, D. ;
Possingham, H. P. ;
Prescott, J. ;
Pressey, R. L. ;
Skilleter, G. A. ;
Simpson, C. ;
Waples, K. ;
Wilson, D. ;
Williamson, D. H. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 114 :84-91
[27]   Developing Implicit Uncertainty Visualization Methods Motivated by Theories in Decision Science [J].
Deitrick, Stephanie ;
Wentz, Elizabeth A. .
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2015, 105 (03) :531-551
[28]  
Dietze M., 2017, Ecological forecasting
[29]   Iterative near-term ecological forecasting: Needs, opportunities, and challenges [J].
Dietze, Michael C. ;
Fox, Andrew ;
Beck-Johnson, Lindsay M. ;
Betancourt, Julio L. ;
Hooten, Mevin B. ;
Jarnevich, Catherine S. ;
Keitt, Timothy H. ;
Kenney, Melissa A. ;
Laney, Christine M. ;
Larsen, Laurel G. ;
Loescher, Henry W. ;
Lunch, Claire K. ;
Pijanowski, Bryan C. ;
Randerson, James T. ;
Read, Emily K. ;
Tredennick, Andrew T. ;
Vargas, Rodrigo ;
Weathers, Kathleen C. ;
White, Ethan P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (07) :1424-1432
[30]   Advancing translational research in environmental science: The role and impact of social sciences [J].
Eisenhauer, Emily ;
Williams, Kathleen C. ;
Margeson, Keahna ;
Paczuski, Sebastian ;
Hano, Mary Clare ;
Mulvaney, Kate .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 120 :165-172