Assessing the multiple benefits of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: A systematic review protocol

被引:4
作者
Phillips, Genevieve A. C. [1 ,2 ]
Krueck, Nils [1 ]
Ogier, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Barrett, Neville [1 ,2 ]
Dutton, Ian [2 ,3 ]
Hartmann, Klaas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Inst Marine & Antarctic Studies, Taroona, Tas, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[3] Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Hobart, Tas, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
RESERVES; AGE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0284711
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThere is global pressure to protect more of the world's oceans, primarily to protect biodiversity, and to fulfill the "30 by 30" goal set by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) that has recently been ratified under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework at the fifteenth Conference of Parties (COP-15). Fully protected marine protected areas (MPAs) provide the highest level of protection for biodiversity from destructive or extractive practices and may limit access to the area itself. Fully protected MPAs (also commonly referred to as 'no-take MPAs') ban all fishing activities, thereby removing the realisation of direct economic and social benefits from resource extraction within these areas. However, fully protected MPAs can still act as source of productivity to surrounding areas, while also providing an important scientific reference role for off-reserve management thereby providing indirect economic and social outcomes, as well as biodiversity benefits. Sustainable marine resource management strives to achieve 'triple-bottom line' benefits, where economic, social, and biodiversity benefits are maximised in managed areas of the ocean. Implementing 'partially protected' areas (PPAs) in areas of high biodiversity value (i.e., inshore, productive areas of the ocean) that allow for some extractive activities, may allow us to supplement fully MPAs to meet IUCN conservation goals, while maximising social and economic benefits. However, our current understanding lacks explicit quantitative assessments of whether and how PPAs can benefit (or otherwise) biodiversity, while also providing economic and social benefits. This study provides a method to systematically review the scientific and legislative literature to understand how PPAs may contribute to conserving biodiversity while also providing social and economic benefits to Australia. Methods and expected outputsThe implementation of partially protected areas (PPAs) requires careful consideration of many potentially competing factors, and an understanding of the types of partial protection already in place in a region. We have developed a systematic literature review protocol focussing on the primary research question: "What is the current state of partially protected area (PPA) implementation across Australian marine areas?". The aim of the review is to provide marine resource managers with a comprehensive overview of PPAs in Australia, including associated goals and stated management strategies to achieve these goals, and a methodological approach that may be utilised globally.The review protocol was designed by the research team for a Fisheries Resource and Development Corporation (FRDC) strategic research grant and will seek input from a project steering committee for the project on aggregation of the initial results. The steering committee is made up of stakeholders from a wide range of backgrounds and interests, covering marine conservation, fisheries management, Indigenous values, and academic research in Australia. Multiple academic databases, alongside Australian Federal, State, and Territory legislation and related policies will be reviewed using Boolean keyword search strings for both academic databases and relevant grey literature. Results from eligible documents will be compiled and insights from the review collated to provide information on the status of PPA implementation in Australia.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Amano Tatsuya, 2016, PLoS Biol, V14, pe2000933, DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.2000933
  • [2] Diversity in marine protected area regulations: Protection approaches for locally appropriate marine management
    Andradi-Brown, Dominic A.
    Veverka, Laura
    Amkieltiela, Nicole L.
    Crane, Nicole E.
    Estradivari, David
    Fox, Helen
    Gill, David
    Goetze, Jordan C.
    Gough, Charlotte E.
    Krueck, Nils L.
    Lester, Sarah
    Mahajan, Shauna
    Rulmal Jr, John N.
    Teoh, Marianne
    Ahmadia, Gabby
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, KUNMING MONTREAL GLO
  • [4] Marine reserves:: size and age do matter
    Claudet, Joachim
    Osenberg, Craig W.
    Benedetti-Cecchi, Lisandro
    Domenici, Paolo
    Garcia-Charton, Jose-Antonio
    Perez-Ruzafa, Angel
    Badalamenti, Fabio
    Bayle-Sempere, Just
    Brito, Alberto
    Bulleri, Fabio
    Culioli, Jean-Michel
    Dimech, Mark
    Falcon, Jesus M.
    Guala, Ivan
    Milazzo, Marco
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    Somerfield, Paul J.
    Stobart, Ben
    Vandeperre, Frederic
    Valle, Carlos
    Planes, Serge
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 11 (05) : 481 - 489
  • [5] Estimating the economic benefits and costs of highly-protected marine protected areas
    Davis, Katrina J.
    Vianna, Gabriel M. S.
    Meeuwig, Jessica J.
    Meekan, Mark G.
    Pannell, David J.
    [J]. ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (10):
  • [6] A Global Deal For Nature: Guiding principles, milestones, and targets
    Dinerstein, E.
    Vynne, C.
    Sala, E.
    Joshi, A. R.
    Fernando, S.
    Lovejoy, T. E.
    Mayorga, J.
    Olson, D.
    Asner, G. P.
    Baillie, J. E. M.
    Burgess, N. D.
    Burkart, K.
    Noss, R. F.
    Zhang, Y. P.
    Baccini, A.
    Birch, T.
    Hahn, N.
    Joppa, L. N.
    Wikramanayake, E.
    [J]. SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2019, 5 (04)
  • [7] A practical guide to question formation, systematic searching and study screening for literature reviews in ecology and evolution
    Foo, Yong Zhi
    O'Dea, Rose E.
    Koricheva, Julia
    Nakagawa, Shinichi
    Lagisz, Malgorzata
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 12 (09): : 1705 - 1720
  • [8] Net contribution of spillover from a marine reserve to fishery catches
    Goni, Raquel
    Hilborn, Ray
    Diaz, David
    Mallol, Sandra
    Adlerstein, Sara
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2010, 400 : 233 - 243
  • [9] The MPA Guide: A framework to achieve global goals for the ocean
    Grorud-Colvert, Kirsten
    Sullivan-Stack, Jenna
    Roberts, Callum
    Constant, Vanessa
    Horta E Costa, Barbara
    Pike, Elizabeth P.
    Kingston, Naomi
    Laffoley, Dan
    Sala, Enric
    Claudet, Joachim
    Friedlander, Alan M.
    Gill, David A.
    Lester, Sarah E.
    Day, Jon C.
    Goncalves, Emanuel J.
    Ahmadia, Gabby N.
    Rand, Matt
    Villagomez, Angelo
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Gurney, Georgina G.
    Spalding, Ana K.
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Briggs, Johnny
    Morgan, Lance E.
    Moffitt, Russell
    Deguignet, Marine
    Pikitch, Ellen K.
    Darling, Emily S.
    Jessen, Sabine
    Hameed, Sarah O.
    Di Carlo, Giuseppe
    Guidetti, Paolo
    Harris, Jean M.
    Torre, Jorge
    Kizilkaya, Zafer
    Agardy, Tundi
    Cury, Philippe
    Shah, Nirmal J.
    Sack, Karen
    Cao, Ling
    Fernandez, Miriam
    Lubchenco, Jane
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 373 (6560)
  • [10] A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management
    Haddaway, N. R.
    Kohl, C.
    da Silva, N. Rebelo
    Schiemann, J.
    Spoek, A.
    Stewart, R.
    Sweet, J. B.
    Wilhelm, R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2017, 6 (01)