Quality and Safety Considerations in Image Guided Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO Safety White Paper Update

被引:4
|
作者
Qi, X. Sharon [1 ]
Albuquerque, Kevin [2 ]
Bailey, Stephanie [3 ]
Dawes, Samantha [4 ]
Kashani, Rojano [5 ]
Li, Heng [6 ]
Mak, Raymond H. [7 ]
Mundt, Arno J. [8 ]
Sio, Terence T. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin Hosp & Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Madison, WI USA
[4] Amer Soc Radiat Oncol, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Seidman Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol & Mol Radiat Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[8] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Med & Appl Sci, San Diego, CA USA
[9] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Radiat Oncol, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
PRACTICE PARAMETER; AMERICAN SOCIETY; RADIOTHERAPY; ASSURANCE; TECHNOLOGIES; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2022.09.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This updated report on image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is part of a series of consensus-based white papers previously published by the American Society for Radiation Oncology addressing patient safety. Since the first white papers were published, IGRT technology and procedures have progressed significantly such that these procedures are now more commonly used. The use of IGRT has now extended beyond high-precision treatments, such as stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy, and into routine clinical practice for many treatment techniques and anatomic sites. Therefore, quality and patient safety considerations for these techniques remain an important area of focus.Methods and Materials: The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened an interdisciplinary task force to assess the original IGRT white paper and update content where appropriate. Recommendations were created using a consensus-building methodology, and task force members indicated their level of agreement based on a 5-point Likert scale from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." A prespecified threshold of >= 75% of raters who selected "strongly agree" or "agree" indicated consensus.Summary: This IGRT white paper builds on the previous version and uses other guidance documents to primarily focus on processes related to quality and safety. IGRT requires an interdisciplinary team-based approach, staffed by appropriately trained specialists, as well as significant personnel resources, specialized technology, and implementation time. A thorough feasibility analysis of resources is required to achieve the clinical and technical goals and should be discussed with all personnel before undertaking new imaging techni-ques. A comprehensive quality-assurance program must be developed, using established guidance, to ensure IGRT is performed in a safe and effective manner. As IGRT technologies continue to improve or emerge, existing practice guidelines should be reviewed or updated regularly according to the latest American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group reports or guidelines. Patient safety in the application of IGRT is everyone's responsibility, and professional organizations, regulators, vendors, and end-users must demonstrate a clear commitment to working together to ensure the highest levels of safety.(c) 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 111
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiation Safety Officer Update
    Phillips, L.
    Dimock, C.
    Kroger, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3550 - 3550
  • [22] Safety Considerations of Fluoroquinolones in the ElderlyAn Update
    Ralf Stahlmann
    Hartmut Lode
    Drugs & Aging, 2010, 27 : 193 - 209
  • [23] Radiation Safety Considerations and Clinical Advantages of α-Emitting Therapy Radionuclides
    Serencsits, Brian
    Chu, Bae P.
    Pandit-Taskar, Neeta
    McDevitt, Michael R.
    Dauer, Lawrence T.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 50 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [24] Safety and efficacy of image guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of anal canal cancer
    De Bari, B.
    Lestrade, L.
    Jumeau, R.
    Kontouri, M.
    Matzinger, O.
    Bourhis, J.
    Zilli, T.
    Ozsahin, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S345 - S346
  • [25] Safety Systems and Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for a Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Radiation Therapy System
    Lamey, M.
    Carlone, M.
    Alasti, H.
    Bissonnette, J. P.
    Borg, J.
    Breen, S.
    Coolens, C.
    Heaton, R.
    Islam, M.
    van Proojen, M.
    Sharpe, M.
    Stanescu, T.
    Jaffray, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4625 - 4625
  • [26] Faculty of Radiation Oncology Position Paper on the use of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy
    Tiong, Albert
    Lao, Louis
    MacKean, James
    Goonetilleke, Madhavi
    Kron, Tomas
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 60 (06) : 772 - 780
  • [27] Radiation Safety in Image-guided Spinal Injections: Risk of Radiation and Techniques for Reducing of Radiation
    Zhou, Yili
    Vu, Hoang
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 28 (01) : 90 - 97
  • [28] Exposure Risks Among Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy: Considerations in the Era of Image Guided Radiation Therapy
    Hess, Clayton B.
    Thompson, Holly M.
    Benedict, Stanley H.
    Seibert, J. Anthony
    Wong, Kenneth
    Vaughan, Andrew T.
    Chen, Allen M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (05): : 978 - 992
  • [29] QUALITY OF IMAGE, QUALITY OF SAFETY
    不详
    MER-MARINE ENGINEERS REVIEW, 1995, : 17 - 17
  • [30] Safety considerations with fibrate therapy
    Davidson, Michael H.
    Armani, Annemarie
    McKenney, James M.
    Jacobson, Terry A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (6A): : 3C - 18C