Towards a standardized protocol to assess natural capital and ecosystem services in solar parks

被引:5
|
作者
Carvalho, Fabio [1 ]
Treasure, Lucy [1 ]
Robinson, Samuel J. B. [1 ,2 ]
Blaydes, Hollie [1 ]
Exley, Giles [1 ]
Hayes, Rachel [3 ]
Howell, Belinda [4 ]
Keith, Aidan [1 ,2 ]
Montag, Hannah [4 ]
Parker, Guy [5 ]
Sharp, Stuart P. [1 ]
Witten, Cameron [3 ]
Armstrong, Alona [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster, England
[2] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Lancaster, England
[3] Solar Energy UK, London, England
[4] Clarkson & Woods Ecol Consultants, Blackford, England
[5] Wychwood Biodivers, Kingsbridge, England
[6] Univ Lancaster, Energy Lancaster, Lancaster, England
来源
ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE | 2023年 / 4卷 / 01期
基金
英国科研创新办公室; “创新英国”项目;
关键词
biodiversity; carbon cycle; land management; nutrient cycling; pollination; soil quality; solar energy; water quality; LAND-USE; ENERGY DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; COMMUNITY ACCEPTANCE; USE EFFICIENCY; POWER-PLANTS; FARMS; BIODIVERSITY; CALIFORNIA; COCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/2688-8319.12210
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Natural capital and ecosystem services have emerged as fundamental concepts of ecosystem management strategies in the past two decades, particularly within major international land assessment frameworks, including the UN's Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services' Global Assessment Report.2. Despite the recent development of several analytical methods and models to quantify changes in natural capital and ecosystem services resulting from land use change, incorporating them into the land planning process can be challenging from a practical point of view without guidance on standard methods.3. In an attempt to decarbonize energy supply systems to meet internationally agreed targets on climate change, solar energy production, in the form of ground-mounted solar parks, is emerging as one of the dominant forms of temporary land use for renewable energies globally.4. We propose 19 directly measurable indicators associated with 16 ecosystem services within three major stocks of natural capital (biodiversity, soil and water) that are most likely to be impacted by the development of solar parks. Indicators are supported by well-established methods that have been widely used in pure and applied land use research within terrestrial ecosystems. Moreover, they can be implemented flexibly according to interest or land management objectives.5. Whilst not intended as a precise recipe for how to assess the effects of solar park development on hosting ecosystems, the protocol will guide the solar energy industry and all actors involved, be they researchers, practitioners, ecological consultancies or statutory bodies, to implement a standardized approach to evaluate temporal and spatial changes in natural capital and ecosystem services resulting from solar park development and operation, with the ultimate aim of generating comparable and reproducible data on ecosystem impact assessment across the solar energy sector.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Toman, M
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 25 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [32] Recreational fisheries in the UK: natural capital, ecosystem services, threats, and management
    Ian J. Winfield
    Fisheries Science, 2016, 82 : 203 - 212
  • [33] Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice
    Guerry, Anne D.
    Polasky, Stephen
    Lubchenco, Jane
    Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    Griffin, Robert
    Ruckelshaus, Mary
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Duraiappah, Anantha
    Elmqvist, Thomas
    Feldman, Marcus W.
    Folke, Carl
    Hoekstra, Jon
    Kareiva, Peter M.
    Keeler, Bonnie L.
    Li, Shuzhuo
    McKenzie, Emily
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    Reyers, Belinda
    Ricketts, Taylor H.
    Rockstrom, Johan
    Tallis, Heather
    Vira, Bhaskar
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (24) : 7348 - 7355
  • [35] Stocks and flows of natural and human-derived capital in ecosystem services
    Jones, L.
    Norton, L.
    Austin, Z.
    Browne, A. L.
    Donovan, D.
    Emmett, B. A.
    Grabowski, Z. J.
    Howard, D. C.
    Jones, J. P. G.
    Kenter, J. O.
    Manley, W.
    Morris, C.
    Robinson, D. A.
    Short, C.
    Siriwardena, G. M.
    Stevens, C. J.
    Storkey, J.
    Waters, R. D.
    Willis, G. F.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 52 : 151 - 162
  • [36] The confused position of the geosciences within the "natural capital" and "ecosystem services" approaches
    Gray, Murray
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 34 : 106 - 112
  • [37] A Sustainable Urban Framework Based on Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Accounting
    Chen, Haonan
    Shi, Yu
    He, Haomiao
    APPLIED SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [38] Recreational fisheries in the UK: natural capital, ecosystem services, threats, and management
    Winfield, Ian J.
    FISHERIES SCIENCE, 2016, 82 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [39] Valuing Supporting Soil Ecosystem Services in Agriculture: A Natural Capital Approach
    Brady, Mark V.
    Hedlund, Katarina
    Cong, Rong-Gang
    Hemerik, Lia
    Hotes, Stefan
    Machado, Stephen
    Mattsson, Lennart
    Schulz, Elke
    Thomsen, Ingrid K.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2015, 107 (05) : 1809 - 1821
  • [40] The impact of human activities on natural capital and ecosystem services of natural pastures in North Xinjiang, China
    Dong, Xiaobin
    Yang, Weikun
    Ulgiati, Sergio
    Yan, Maochao
    Zhang, Xinshi
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 225 : 28 - 39