A multi-criteria decision support model for adopting energy efficiency technologies in the iron and steel industry

被引:3
|
作者
Ren, Hongtao [1 ]
Zhou, Wenji [2 ]
Makowski, Marek [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Shaohui [3 ,5 ]
Yu, Yadong [1 ]
Ma, Tieju [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Meilong Rd 130, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] Renmin Univ China, Sch Appl Econ, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[3] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[4] Polish Acad Sci, Syst Res Inst, Newelska 6, PL-01447 Warsaw, Poland
[5] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 37 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-criteria decision analysis; Energy efficiency; Technology adoption; Iron and steel production; Air pollution; AIR-POLLUTION ABATEMENT; CO2 EMISSION REDUCTION; CHINA IRON; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; IMPROVEMENT; INVESTMENT; SYSTEMS; SAVINGS; INDIA; POWER;
D O I
10.1007/s10479-022-04548-z
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Promoting energy efficiency in iron and steel production provides opportunities for mitigating environmental impacts from this energy-intensive industry. Energy efficiency technologies differ in investment costs, fuel-saving potentials, and environmental performance. Hence the decision-making of the adoption strategy needs to prioritize technological combinations concerning these multi-dimensional objectives. To address this problem, this study proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-support model for adopting energy efficiency technologies in the iron and steel industry. The modeling framework integrates a linear programming model that determines the optimal technology adoption rates based on the techno-economic, energy, and environmental performance details and an interactive multi-criteria model analysis tool for diverse modeling environments. A real case study was performed in which a total number of 56 energy efficiency technologies were investigated against various criteria concerning economics, energy, and environmental performances. The results examine the tradeoffs and synergies were examined with regard to seven criteria. A balanced solution shows that a total investment of 13.4 billion USD could save 2.51 Exajoule fuel consumption, cut 67.4 million tons (Mton) CO2 emissions, and reduce air pollution of 1.5 Mton SO2, 1.41 Mton NOx, and 0.86 Mton PM, respectively. The case study demonstrates the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed multi-criteria decision-making support framework.
引用
收藏
页码:1111 / 1132
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management
    Bernhard Wolfslehner
    Rupert Seidl
    Environmental Management, 2010, 46 : 850 - 861
  • [42] Review of evaluation methodologies and influencing factors for energy efficiency of the iron and steel industry
    Na, Hongming
    Du, Tao
    Sun, Wenqiang
    He, Jianfei
    Sun, Jingchao
    Yuan, Yuxing
    Qiu, Ziyang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (11) : 5659 - 5677
  • [43] Energy Efficiency contribution to sustainable development: A multi-criteria approach in Greece
    Neofytou, Hera
    Sarafidis, Yannis
    Gkonis, Nikolaos
    Mirasgedis, Sebastian
    Askounis, Dimitris
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2020, 15 (10-12) : 572 - 604
  • [44] Sustainability Assessment of Electricity Generation Technologies in Egypt Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Shaaban, Mostafa
    Scheffran, Juergen
    Boehner, Juergen
    Elsobki, Mohamed S.
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (05)
  • [45] A review of energy use and energy-efficient technologies for the iron and steel industry
    He, Kun
    Wang, Li
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 70 : 1022 - 1039
  • [46] Comparative Analysis of Five Widely-Used Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Evaluate Clean Energy Technologies: A Case Study
    Effatpanah, Saeed Khojaste
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein
    Aungkulanon, Pasura
    Maleki, Akbar
    Sadeghzadeh, Milad
    Sharifpur, Mohsen
    Chen, Lingen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [47] Assessing Private Investment in African Renewable Energy Infrastructure: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
    Baumli, Kenny
    Jamasb, Tooraj
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 19
  • [48] Sustainable supplier selection in the apparel industry: an integrated AHP-TOPSIS model for multi-criteria decision analysis
    Ha, Nhu Ngoc Phan
    Nguyen, Duc Duy
    Le, Song Thanh Quynh
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF TEXTILE AND APPAREL, 2024,
  • [49] Multi-criteria Decision Analysis to Model Ixodes ricinus Habitat Suitability
    Raphaël Rousseau
    Guy McGrath
    Barry J. McMahon
    Sophie O. Vanwambeke
    EcoHealth, 2017, 14 : 591 - 602
  • [50] Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of the Logistics Companies using TOPSIS Model
    Lam, Weng Siew
    Lee, Pei Fun
    Lam, Weng Hoe
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AID SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS (DASA), 2022, : 574 - 578