Do Polygenic Risk Scores Add to Clinical Data in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer? A Scoping Review

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Louise [1 ,2 ,3 ,8 ]
Grimshaw, Alyssa A. [4 ]
Mezzacappa, Catherine [2 ]
Larki, Navid Rahimi [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yu-Xiao [3 ,5 ]
Justice, Amy C. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Digest Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Yale Univ, Harvey Cushing John Hay Whitney Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Med, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[8] 200 West Campus Dr, Orange, CT 06477 USA
关键词
GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI; VARIANTS; ONSET; MODEL;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0468
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) summarize an individual's germline genetic risk, but it is unclear whether PRS offer independent information for pancreatic cancer risk prediction beyond routine clinical data.Methods: We searched 8 databases from database inception to March 10, 2023 to identify studies evaluating the independent performance of pancreatic cancer-specific PRS for pancreatic cancer beyond clinical risk factors.Results: Twenty-one studies examined associations between a pancreatic cancer-specific PRS and pancreatic cancer. Seven studies evaluated risk factors beyond age and sex. Three studies evaluated the change in discrimination associated with the addition of PRS to routine risk factors and reported improvements (AUCs: 0.715 to 0.745; AUC 0.791 to 0.830; AUC from 0.694 to 0.711). Limitations to clinical applicability included using source populations younger/healthier than those at risk for pancreatic cancer (n = 10), exclusively of European ancestry (n = 13), or controls without relevant exposures (n = 1).Conclusions: While most studies of pancreatic cancer-specific PRS did not evaluate the independent discrimination of PRS for pancreatic cancer beyond routine risk factors, three that did showed improvements in discrimination.Impact: For pancreatic cancer PRS to be clinically useful, they must demonstrate substantial improvements in discrimination beyond established risk factors, apply to diverse ancestral populations representative of those at risk for pancreatic cancer, and use appropriate controls.
引用
收藏
页码:1490 / 1497
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical validity and utility of genetic risk scores in prostate cancer
    Helfand, Brian T.
    Kearns, James
    Conran, Carly
    Xu, Jianfeng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2016, 18 (04) : 509 - 514
  • [42] Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes
    Mavaddat, Nasim
    Michailidou, Kyriaki
    Dennis, Joe
    Lush, Michael
    Fachal, Laura
    Lee, Andrew
    Tyrer, Jonathan P.
    Chen, Ting-Huei
    Wang, Qin
    Bolla, Manjeet K.
    Yang, Xin
    Adank, Muriel A.
    Ahearn, Thomas
    Aittomaki, Kristiina
    Allen, Jamie
    Andrulis, Irene L.
    Anton-Culver, Hoda
    Antonenkova, Natalia N.
    Arndt, Volker
    Aronson, Kristan J.
    Auer, Paul L.
    Auvinen, Paivi
    Barrdahl, Myrto
    Freeman, Laura E. Beane
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Behrens, Sabine
    Benitez, Javier
    Bermisheva, Marina
    Bernstein, Leslie
    Blomqvist, Carl
    Bogdanova, Natalia, V
    Bojesen, Stig E.
    Bonanni, Bernardo
    Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise
    Brauch, Hiltrud
    Bremer, Michael
    Brenner, Hermann
    Brentnall, Adam
    Brock, Ian W.
    Brooks-Wilson, Angela
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Bruening, Thomas
    Burwinkel, Barbara
    Campa, Daniele
    Carter, Brian D.
    Castelao, Jose E.
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Chlebowski, Rowan
    Christiansen, Hans
    Clarke, Christine L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 104 (01) : 21 - 34
  • [43] Polygenic Risk Scores in Clinical Psychology: Bridging Genomic Risk to Individual Differences
    Bogdan, Ryan
    Baranger, David A. A.
    Agrawal, Arpana
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 14, 2018, 14 : 119 - 157
  • [44] Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer in Korean women
    Jee, Yon Ho
    Ho, Weang-Kee
    Park, Sohee
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Teo, Soo-Hwang
    Jung, Keum Ji
    Kraft, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 52 (03) : 796 - 805
  • [45] Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer in Women of African Ancestry
    Du, Zhaohui
    Gao, Guimin
    Adedokun, Babatunde
    Ahearn, Thomas
    Lunetta, Kathryn L.
    Zirpoli, Gary
    Troester, Melissa A.
    Ruiz-Narvaez, Edward A.
    Haddad, Stephen A.
    PalChoudhury, Parichoy
    Figueroa, Jonine
    John, Esther M.
    Bernstein, Leslie
    Zheng, Wei
    Hu, Jennifer J.
    Ziegler, Regina G.
    Nyante, Sarah
    Bandera, Elisa, V
    Ingles, Sue A.
    Mancuso, Nicholas
    Press, Michael F.
    Deming, Sandra L.
    Rodriguez-Gil, Jorge L.
    Yao, Song
    Ogundiran, Temidayo O.
    Ojengbe, Oladosu
    Bolla, Manjeet K.
    Dennis, Joe
    Dunning, Alison M.
    Easton, Douglas F.
    Michailidou, Kyriaki
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Sandler, Dale P.
    Taylor, Jack A.
    Wang, Qin
    Weinberg, Clarice R.
    Kitahara, Cari M.
    Blot, William
    Nathanson, Katherine L.
    Hennis, Anselm
    Nemesure, Barbara
    Ambs, Stefan
    Sucheston-Campbell, Lara E.
    Bensen, Jeannette T.
    Chanock, Stephen J.
    Olshan, Andrew F.
    Ambrosone, Christine B.
    Olopade, Olufunmilayo, I
    Yarney, Joel
    Awuah, Baffour
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (09): : 1168 - 1176
  • [46] Association of prescription data with clinical manifestations and polygenic risk scores in patients with bipolar I disorder: An exploratory study
    Park, Young-Min
    Lee, Bun-Hee
    Shekhtman, Tatyana
    Kelsoe, John R.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 367 : 31 - 37
  • [47] Population-specific validation and comparison of the performance of 77-and 313-variant polygenic risk scores for breast cancer risk prediction
    Hovhannisyan, Milena
    Zemankova, Petra
    Nehasil, Petr
    Matejkova, Katerina
    Borecka, Marianna
    Cerna, Marta
    Dolezalova, Tatana
    Dvorakova, Lenka
    Foretova, Lenka
    Horackova, Klara
    Jelinkova, Sandra
    Just, Pavel
    Kalousova, Marta
    Kral, Jan
    Machackova, Eva
    Nemcova, Barbora
    Safarikova, Marketa
    Springer, Drahomira
    Stastna, Barbora
    Tavandzis, Spiros
    Vocka, Michal
    Zima, Tomas
    Soukupova, Jana
    Kleiblova, Petra
    Ernst, Corinna
    Kleibl, Zdenek
    Janatova, Marketa
    CANCER, 2024, 130 (17) : 2978 - 2987
  • [48] Evaluation of polygenic risk scores for ovarian cancer risk prediction in a prospective cohort study
    Yang, Xin
    Leslie, Goska
    Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
    Ryan, Andy
    Intermaggio, Maria
    Lee, Andrew
    Kalsi, Jatinderpal K.
    Tyrer, Jonathan
    Gaba, Faiza
    Manchanda, Ranjit
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    Gayther, Simon A.
    Ramus, Susan J.
    Jacobs, Ian
    Menon, Usha
    Antoniou, Antonis C.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2018, 55 (08) : 546 - 554
  • [49] Dissecting clinical heterogeneity of bipolar disorder using multiple polygenic risk scores
    Coombes, Brandon J.
    Markota, Matej
    Mann, J. John
    Colby, Colin
    Stahl, Eli
    Talati, Ardesheer
    Pathak, Jyotishman
    Weissman, Myrna M.
    McElroy, Susan L.
    Frye, Mark A.
    Biernacka, Joanna M.
    TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [50] Assessing the prediction of type 2 diabetes risk using polygenic and clinical risk scores in South Asian study populations
    Rout, Madhusmita
    Wander, Gurpreet S.
    Ralhan, Sarju
    Singh, Jai Rup
    Aston, Christopher E.
    Blackett, Piers R.
    Chernausek, Steven
    Sanghera, Dharambir K.
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2023, 14