Do Polygenic Risk Scores Add to Clinical Data in Predicting Pancreatic Cancer? A Scoping Review

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Louise [1 ,2 ,3 ,8 ]
Grimshaw, Alyssa A. [4 ]
Mezzacappa, Catherine [2 ]
Larki, Navid Rahimi [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Yu-Xiao [3 ,5 ]
Justice, Amy C. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Digest Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Yale Univ, Harvey Cushing John Hay Whitney Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[6] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Med, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
[8] 200 West Campus Dr, Orange, CT 06477 USA
关键词
GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI; VARIANTS; ONSET; MODEL;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0468
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) summarize an individual's germline genetic risk, but it is unclear whether PRS offer independent information for pancreatic cancer risk prediction beyond routine clinical data.Methods: We searched 8 databases from database inception to March 10, 2023 to identify studies evaluating the independent performance of pancreatic cancer-specific PRS for pancreatic cancer beyond clinical risk factors.Results: Twenty-one studies examined associations between a pancreatic cancer-specific PRS and pancreatic cancer. Seven studies evaluated risk factors beyond age and sex. Three studies evaluated the change in discrimination associated with the addition of PRS to routine risk factors and reported improvements (AUCs: 0.715 to 0.745; AUC 0.791 to 0.830; AUC from 0.694 to 0.711). Limitations to clinical applicability included using source populations younger/healthier than those at risk for pancreatic cancer (n = 10), exclusively of European ancestry (n = 13), or controls without relevant exposures (n = 1).Conclusions: While most studies of pancreatic cancer-specific PRS did not evaluate the independent discrimination of PRS for pancreatic cancer beyond routine risk factors, three that did showed improvements in discrimination.Impact: For pancreatic cancer PRS to be clinically useful, they must demonstrate substantial improvements in discrimination beyond established risk factors, apply to diverse ancestral populations representative of those at risk for pancreatic cancer, and use appropriate controls.
引用
收藏
页码:1490 / 1497
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk Stratification and Clinical Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Ophthalmology
    Qassim, Ayub
    Souzeau, Emmanuelle
    Hollitt, Georgie
    Hassall, Mark M.
    Siggs, Owen M.
    Craig, Jamie E.
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 10 (06):
  • [22] How Well do Polygenic Risk Scores Identify Men at High Risk for Prostate Cancer? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Siltari, Aino
    Lonnerbro, Ragnar
    Pang, Karl
    Shiranov, Kirill
    Asiimwe, Alex
    Evans-Axelsson, Susan
    Franks, Billy
    Kiran, Amit
    Murtola, Teemu J.
    Schalken, Jack
    Steinbeisser, Carl
    Bjartell, Anders
    PIONEER Consortium
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2023, 21 (02) : 316e1 - 316e11
  • [23] Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score
    Shieh, Yiwey
    Hu, Donglei
    Ma, Lin
    Huntsman, Scott
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Cummings, Steven R.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Ziv, Elad
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 159 (03) : 513 - 525
  • [24] Could Polygenic Risk Scores Be Useful in Psychiatry? A Review
    Murray, Graham K.
    Lin, Tian
    Austin, Jehannine
    McGrath, John J.
    Hickie, Ian B.
    Wray, Naomi R.
    JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 78 (02) : 210 - 219
  • [25] Application of European-specific polygenic risk scores for predicting prostate cancer risk in different ancestry populations
    Ruan, Xiaohao
    Huang, Da
    Huang, Jingyi
    Xu, Danfeng
    Na, Rong
    PROSTATE, 2023, 83 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [26] Translating polygenic risk scores for clinical use by estimating the confidence bounds of risk prediction
    Sun, Jiangming
    Wang, Yunpeng
    Folkersen, Lasse
    Borne, Yan
    Amlien, Inge
    Buil, Alfonso
    Orho-Melander, Marju
    Borglum, Anders D.
    Hougaard, David M.
    Melander, Olle
    Engstrom, Gunnar
    Werge, Thomas
    Lage, Kasper
    Lotta, Luca Andrea
    Jones, Marcus
    Baras, Aris
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [27] Cancer PRSweb: An Online Repository with Polygenic Risk Scores for Major Cancer Traits and Their Evaluation in Two Independent Biobanks
    Fritsche, Lars G.
    Patil, Snehal
    Beesley, Lauren J.
    VandeHaar, Peter
    Salvatore, Maxwell
    Ma, Ying
    Peng, Robert B.
    Taliun, Daniel
    Zhou, Xiang
    Mukherjee, Bhramar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 107 (05) : 815 - 836
  • [28] Will polygenic risk scores for cancer ever be clinically useful?
    Sud, Amit
    Turnbull, Clare
    Houlston, Richard
    NPJ PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [29] Developing and validating polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer risk prediction in East Asians
    Ping, Jie
    Yang, Yaohua
    Wen, Wanqing
    Kweon, Sun-Seog
    Matsuda, Koichi
    Jia, Wei-Hua
    Shin, Aesun
    Gao, Yu-Tang
    Matsuo, Keitaro
    Kim, Jeongseon
    Kim, Dong-Hyun
    Jee, Sun Ha
    Cai, Qiuyin
    Chen, Zhishan
    Tao, Ran
    Shin, Min-Ho
    Tanikawa, Chizu
    Pan, Zhi-Zhong
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    Oze, Isao
    Ahn, Yoon-Ok
    Jung, Keum Ji
    Ren, Zefang
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    Long, Jirong
    Zheng, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 151 (10) : 1726 - 1736
  • [30] Predicting Cognitive Executive Functioning with Polygenic Risk Scores for Psychiatric Disorders
    Benca, Chelsie E.
    Derringer, Jaime L.
    Corley, Robin P.
    Young, Susan E.
    Keller, Matthew C.
    Hewitt, John K.
    Friedman, Naomi P.
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2017, 47 (01) : 11 - 24