Exceptional Cases of Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Cancer-Related Pain

被引:2
|
作者
Bulat, Evgeny [2 ]
Chakravarthy, Vikram [3 ]
Crowther, Jason [2 ]
Rakesh, Neal [4 ]
Barzilai, Ori [3 ]
Gulati, Amitabh [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, 1275 York Ave,M 308, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Pain Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2023年 / 26卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cancer pain; intrathecal pump; neuromodulation; opioids; spinal cord stimulator; CHRONIC BACK; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.neurom.2022.06.002
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Cancer pain has traditionally been managed with opioids, adjuvant medications, and interventions including injections, neural blockade, and intrathecal pump (ITP). Spinal cord stimulation (SCS), although increasingly used for conditions such as failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome, is not currently recommended for cancer pain. However, patients with cancer-related pain have demonstrated benefit with SCS. We sought to better characterize these patients and the benefit of SCS in exceptional cases of refractory pain secondary to progression of disease or evolving treatment-related complications.Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective case series at a tertiary cancer center. Adults & GE;18 years old with active cancer and evolving pain secondary to disease progression or treatment, whose symptoms were refractory to systemic opioids, and who underwent SCS trial followed by percutaneous implantation between 2016 and 2021 were included. Descriptive statistics included mean, SD, median, and interquartile range (IQR).Results: Eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age at SCS trial was 60.0 (SD: & PLUSMN;11.6) years, and 50% were men. Compared with baseline, the median (IQR) change in pain score by numeric rating scale (NRS) after trial was -3 (2). At an average of 14 days after implant, the median (IQR) change in NRS and daily oral morphine equivalents were -2 (3.5) and -126 mg (1095 mg), respectively. At a median of 63 days after implant, the corresponding values were -3 (0.75) and -96 mg (711 mg). There was no significant change in adjuvant therapies after SCS implantation at follow-up. Six patients were discharged within two days after implantation. Two patients were readmitted for pain control within the follow-up period.Conclusions: In patients with cancer-related pain, SCS may significantly relieve pain, reduce systemic daily opioid consumption, and potentially decrease hospital length of stay and readmission for pain control. It may be appropriate to consider an SCS trial before ITP in select cases of cancer-related pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1058
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of spinal cord electrode stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain-State of art
    Neto, Joaquim Fechine de Alencar
    Oliveira, Rocymar Reboucas
    Dias, Artemio Jose Araruna
    Neto, Otavio da Cunha Ferreira
    de Lira, Ana Carolina Soares
    Bastos, Barbara Farias
    Rocha, Maria Lufsa
    Marques, Lufs Felipe Ferreira
    Queiroga, Pedro Henrique Maximo
    Lemos, Nilson Batista
    Neto, Fernando de Paiva Melo
    Lopes, Anderson Albert Primo
    Bem, Luiz Severo
    de Azevedo, Hildo Rocha Cirne
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30
  • [42] Personalising pain control with spinal cord stimulation
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2020, 19 (02) : 103 - 104
  • [43] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Chronic Pain
    Leonardo Kapural
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2014, 18
  • [44] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Intractable Chronic Pain
    Kapural, Leonardo
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2014, 18 (04)
  • [45] Spinal cord stimulation for visceral pain: A review
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Dua, Susheel
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2007, 109 (03) : 227 - 230
  • [46] Neuromodulation for Medically Refractory Neuropathic Pain: Spinal Cord Stimulation, Deep Brain Stimulation, Motor Cortex Stimulation, and Posterior Insula Stimulation
    Galafassi, Giovanna Zambo
    Simm Pires de Aguiar, Pedro Henrique
    Simm, Renata Faria
    Franceschini, Paulo Roberto
    Prist Filho, Marco
    Pagura, Jorge Roberto
    Pires de Aguiar, Paulo Henrique
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 146 : 246 - 260
  • [47] Reduced Areas of Spontaneous Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Stimulation Treatment
    Meier, Kaare
    Jensen, Troels S.
    Christensen, Bente M.
    Molgaard, Morten E.
    Sorensen, Jens C.
    Nikolajsen, Lone
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2014, 30 (03) : 232 - 237
  • [48] Spinal Cord Stimulation for Electrical Storm Refractory to Conventional Medical Treatment: An Emerging Indication?
    Gulve, Ashish
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (03): : 196 - 196
  • [49] Efficacy and Safety of Two Methadone Titration Methods for the Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain: The EQUIMETH2 Trial (Methadone for Cancer-Related Pain)
    Poulain, Philippe
    Berleur, Marie-Pierre
    Lefki, Shimsi
    Lefebvre, Daniele
    Chvetzoff, Gisele
    Serra, Eric
    Tremellat, Fibra
    Derniaux, Alain
    Filbet, Marilene
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (05) : 626 - +
  • [50] 1.2kHzHigh-Frequency Stimulation as a Rescue Therapy in Patients With Chronic Pain Refractory to Conventional Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Andrade, Pablo
    Heiden, Petra
    Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
    Matis, Georgios
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (03): : 540 - 545