Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

被引:6
作者
Labib, Krishma [1 ]
Evans, Natalie [1 ]
Pizzolato, Daniel [2 ]
Bonn, Noemie Aubert [1 ]
Widdershoven, Guy [1 ]
Bouter, Lex [3 ,4 ]
Konach, Teodora [5 ]
Langendam, Miranda [6 ]
Dierickx, Kris [2 ]
Tijdink, Joeri [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Med Ctr,Dept Ethics Law & Humanities, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Leuven, Ctr Biomed Ethics & Law, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 35,Box 7001, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Philosophy, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Dept Biostat & Data Sci,Med Ctr, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Austrian Agcy Res Integr, Landstrasser Hauptstr 9,TOP 21, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Med Ctr,Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Education; Training; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research; Guidelines; Institutions; RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We used an iterative co-creative process. We conducted four half-day online co-creation workshops with 16 participants in total, which were informed by the RI education evidence-base. In the first two workshops, participants generated ideas for guidelines' content, focusing on different target groups and various approaches to RI education. Based on this content we developed first drafts of the guidelines. Participants in the third and fourth workshop refined those drafts. We next organized a working group which further prioritized, reorganized, and optimized the content of the guidelines. We developed four guidelines on RI education focusing on (a) bachelor, master and PhD students; (b) post-doctorate and senior researchers; (c) other RI stakeholders; as well as (d) continuous RI education. Across guidelines, we recommend mandatory RI training; follow-up refresher training; informal discussions about RI; appropriate rewards and incentives for active participation in RI education; and evaluation of RI educational events. Our work provides experience-based co-created guidance to research institutions on what to consider when developing a successful RI education strategy. Each guideline is offered as a distinct, publicly available tool in our toolbox () which institutions can access, adapt and implement to meet their institution-specific RI education needs.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contribution of PRME in education, research, and outreach in Brazilian higher education institutions
    Avelar, Aline Bento Ambrosio
    da Silva-Oliveira, Keilla Dayane
    Farina, Milton Carlos
    Pereira, Raquel da Silva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 23 (02) : 283 - 300
  • [42] Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education
    Rasmussen, Lisa M.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024, 31 (07): : 944 - 967
  • [43] Research Integrity definitions and challenges
    Armond, Anna Catharina V.
    Cobey, Kelly D.
    Moher, David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 171
  • [44] Co-Creating History: The Case of WORTHY as a Virtual Collaborative Museum
    Marini, Camilla
    Agostino, Deborah
    Simoni, Loretta
    JOURNAL OF MUSEUM EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (03) : 385 - 394
  • [45] Co-creating inclusive public services with customers experiencing vulnerability
    Grech, Nicholas
    Greer, Dominique A.
    Russell-Bennett, Rebekah
    JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 2025,
  • [46] The "gender" variable in the research process: Requirements contained in the application guidelines offunding institutions in the health sector
    Aldin, Angela
    Clever, Katharina
    Skoetz, Nicole
    Meyer, Gabriele
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2020, 158 : 10 - 15
  • [47] Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
    Wager, Elizabeth
    Kleinert, Sabine
    MATURITAS, 2012, 72 (02) : 165 - 169
  • [48] Expanding Research Integrity: A Cultural-Practice Perspective
    Valkenburg, Govert
    Dix, Guus
    Tijdink, Joeri
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2021, 27 (01)
  • [49] Challenges when creating a Latin American community in education and research
    Gonzalez Banales, Dora Luz
    Camacho Delgado, Clemencia
    Orantes de Pineda, Blanca Ruth
    PANORAMA, 2012, 6 (10) : 57 - 69
  • [50] Deprescribing guidelines: An international symposium on development, implementation, research and health professional education
    Farrell, Barbara
    Conklin, James
    Dolovich, Lisa
    Irving, Hannah
    Maclure, Malcolm
    McCarthy, Lisa
    Moriarty, Frank
    Pottie, Kevin
    Raman-Wilms, Lalitha
    Reeve, Emily
    Thompson, Wade
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2019, 15 (06) : 780 - 789