Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

被引:6
作者
Labib, Krishma [1 ]
Evans, Natalie [1 ]
Pizzolato, Daniel [2 ]
Bonn, Noemie Aubert [1 ]
Widdershoven, Guy [1 ]
Bouter, Lex [3 ,4 ]
Konach, Teodora [5 ]
Langendam, Miranda [6 ]
Dierickx, Kris [2 ]
Tijdink, Joeri [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Med Ctr,Dept Ethics Law & Humanities, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Leuven, Ctr Biomed Ethics & Law, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 35,Box 7001, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Philosophy, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Dept Biostat & Data Sci,Med Ctr, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Austrian Agcy Res Integr, Landstrasser Hauptstr 9,TOP 21, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Med Ctr,Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Education; Training; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research; Guidelines; Institutions; RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We used an iterative co-creative process. We conducted four half-day online co-creation workshops with 16 participants in total, which were informed by the RI education evidence-base. In the first two workshops, participants generated ideas for guidelines' content, focusing on different target groups and various approaches to RI education. Based on this content we developed first drafts of the guidelines. Participants in the third and fourth workshop refined those drafts. We next organized a working group which further prioritized, reorganized, and optimized the content of the guidelines. We developed four guidelines on RI education focusing on (a) bachelor, master and PhD students; (b) post-doctorate and senior researchers; (c) other RI stakeholders; as well as (d) continuous RI education. Across guidelines, we recommend mandatory RI training; follow-up refresher training; informal discussions about RI; appropriate rewards and incentives for active participation in RI education; and evaluation of RI educational events. Our work provides experience-based co-created guidance to research institutions on what to consider when developing a successful RI education strategy. Each guideline is offered as a distinct, publicly available tool in our toolbox () which institutions can access, adapt and implement to meet their institution-specific RI education needs.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe
    Palos, Andrijana Perkovic
    Roje, Rea
    Tomic, Vicko
    Marusic, Ana
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024, 31 (06): : 620 - 654
  • [32] Using mixed methods research to study research integrity: Current status, issues, and guidelines
    Tang, Gengyan
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2025,
  • [33] Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study
    Labib, Krishma
    Roje, Rea
    Bouter, Lex
    Widdershoven, Guy
    Evans, Natalie
    Marusic, Ana
    Mokkink, Lidwine
    Tijdink, Joeri
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2021, 27 (04)
  • [34] A protocol for co-creating research project lay summaries with stakeholders: Guideline development for Canada's AGE-WELL network
    Wada M.
    Sixsmith J.
    Harwood G.
    Cosco T.D.
    Fang M.L.
    Sixsmith A.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 6 (1)
  • [35] Teaching research integrity as discussed in research integrity codes: A systematic literature review
    Crean, Daniel
    Gordijn, Bert
    Kearns, Alan J.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2025, 32 (03): : 369 - 392
  • [36] A Taxonomy for Research Intergrity Training: Design, Conduct, and Improvements in Research Integrity Courses
    van den Hoven, Mariette
    Lindemann, Tom
    Zollitsch, Linda
    Priess-Buchheit, Julia
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2023, 29 (03)
  • [37] Research Design in Education: Guidelines for Literature Review
    Esquivel Corella, Freddy
    REVISTA EDUCACION, 2013, 37 (01): : 65 - 87
  • [38] Research Integrity in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Preface
    Moss, Sharon E.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2011, 54 (01): : S300 - S302
  • [39] Make research-integrity education fun and relevant
    Chau, De-Ming
    NATURE, 2020, 587 (7832) : 9 - 9
  • [40] Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts
    Roje, Rea
    Tomic, Vicko
    Buljan, Ivan
    Marusic, Ana
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2023, 30 (06): : 293 - 330