Co-creating Research Integrity Education Guidelines for Research Institutions

被引:6
作者
Labib, Krishma [1 ]
Evans, Natalie [1 ]
Pizzolato, Daniel [2 ]
Bonn, Noemie Aubert [1 ]
Widdershoven, Guy [1 ]
Bouter, Lex [3 ,4 ]
Konach, Teodora [5 ]
Langendam, Miranda [6 ]
Dierickx, Kris [2 ]
Tijdink, Joeri [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Med Ctr,Dept Ethics Law & Humanities, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Leuven, Ctr Biomed Ethics & Law, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 35,Box 7001, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Philosophy, De Boelelaan 1105, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Dept Biostat & Data Sci,Med Ctr, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Austrian Agcy Res Integr, Landstrasser Hauptstr 9,TOP 21, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Inst, Med Ctr,Dept Biostat & Data Sci, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Education; Training; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research; Guidelines; Institutions; RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT;
D O I
10.1007/s11948-023-00444-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
To foster research integrity (RI), research institutions should develop a continuous RI education approach, addressing various target groups. To support institutions to achieve this, we developed RI education guidelines together with RI experts and research administrators, exploring similarities and differences in recommendations across target groups, as well as recommendations about RI education using approaches other than formal RI training. We used an iterative co-creative process. We conducted four half-day online co-creation workshops with 16 participants in total, which were informed by the RI education evidence-base. In the first two workshops, participants generated ideas for guidelines' content, focusing on different target groups and various approaches to RI education. Based on this content we developed first drafts of the guidelines. Participants in the third and fourth workshop refined those drafts. We next organized a working group which further prioritized, reorganized, and optimized the content of the guidelines. We developed four guidelines on RI education focusing on (a) bachelor, master and PhD students; (b) post-doctorate and senior researchers; (c) other RI stakeholders; as well as (d) continuous RI education. Across guidelines, we recommend mandatory RI training; follow-up refresher training; informal discussions about RI; appropriate rewards and incentives for active participation in RI education; and evaluation of RI educational events. Our work provides experience-based co-created guidance to research institutions on what to consider when developing a successful RI education strategy. Each guideline is offered as a distinct, publicly available tool in our toolbox () which institutions can access, adapt and implement to meet their institution-specific RI education needs.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reproducibility and research integrity: the role of scientists and institutions COMMENT
    Diaba-Nuhoho, Patrick
    Amponsah-Offeh, Michael
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [22] Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions
    Andrew Grey
    Mark Bolland
    Greg Gamble
    Alison Avenell
    Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4
  • [23] Co-responsibility for research integrity
    Carl Mitcham
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2003, 9 : 273 - 290
  • [24] Co-responsibility for research integrity
    Mitcham, C
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2003, 9 (02) : 273 - 290
  • [25] Guidelines for Methodological Adequacy and Integrity in Business Administration Research
    Veludo-de-Oliveira, Tania Modesto
    Oliveira, Braulio
    REVISTA ADMINISTRACAO EM DIALOGO, 2012, 14 (01): : 79 - 107
  • [26] Research Integrity in Guidelines and evIDence synthesis (RIGID): a framework for assessing research integrity in guideline development and evidence synthesis
    Mousa, Aya
    Flanagan, Madeline
    Tay, Chau Thien
    Norman, Robert J.
    Costello, Michael
    Li, Wentao
    Wang, Rui
    Teede, Helena
    Mol, Ben W.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2024, 74
  • [27] Changemakers as digital makers: Connecting and co-creating
    Whewell, Emma
    Caldwell, Helen
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Andone, Diana
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 27 (05) : 6691 - 6713
  • [28] Integrity in Postgraduate Research: The Student Voice
    Mahmud, Saadia
    Bretag, Tracey
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2015, 21 (06) : 1657 - 1672
  • [29] Teaching phronesis in a research integrity course
    Goddiksen, Mads Paludan
    Gjerris, Mickey
    FACETS, 2022, 7 : 139 - 152
  • [30] Establishing and Maintaining Research Integrity at Academic Institutions: Challenges and Opportunities
    Robishaw, Janet D.
    DeMets, David L.
    Wood, Sarah K.
    Boiselle, Phillip M.
    Hennekens, Charles H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 133 (03) : E87 - E90