Diagnostic Evaluation of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy

被引:3
作者
Caymaz, Ismail [1 ,2 ]
Afandiyeva, Nargiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Oncol, Dept Gastroenterol, Baku, Azerbaijan
[2] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Goztepe Training & Res Hosp, Doktor Erkin St, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy; Chronic pancreatitis; Diagnostic yield; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Pancreatic solid lesion; TISSUE ACQUISITION; EUS-FNA; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00270-023-03494-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeThe main objective of the present study is to compare the safety, technical success and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) versus ultrasound-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy (US-CNB) in patients with solid pancreatic lesions.MethodsThis is a retrospective study that involved all patients with a solid pancreatic lesion who underwent EUS-FNA or US-CNB between November 2019 and February 2021. Of all patients, 69 (84.1%) had inoperable malignancy, whereas 13 (15.9%) had chronic pancreatitis. Resectability status was ascertained by computed tomography. All core needle biopsies were performed by the same interventional radiologist via ultrasound guidance with an 18-gauge semi-automatic tru-cut needle. All EUS-FNA procedures were performed by the same gastroenterologist with a 27-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Technical success is defined as if the region of interest is reached and specimen taken from the pancreatic lesion. Diagnostic yield is defined as the procurement of sufficient tissue for pathological examination.ResultsOverall, 52 patients (mean age 58.5 & PLUSMN; 9.8 years) who underwent EUS-FNA and 30 patients (60.1 & PLUSMN; 12.1 years) who underwent US-CNB were included. Solid lesions were most commonly (61.5% in EUS-FNA and 50.0% in US-CNB groups) located in pancreatic head in both groups. Mean size of the lesions was comparable in both groups as well. The technical success was 100% in both groups. In 12 (14.6%) patients, pathology results revealed inadequate sampling (11 x in the EUS-FNA and 1 x in the US-CNB group). The diagnostic yield was significantly higher in US-CNB group than in EUS-FNA group (96.7% vs. 78.8%, respectively, p = 0.048). Of 11 patients in the EUS-FNA with inadequate sampling, pancreatic lesions were located in the pancreatic head in 7 (63.6%). No major complications were observed in neither of the groups. As a minor complication, one case of slight abdominal pain was detected in the EUS-FNA group.ConclusionBased on the results of the present study, both US-CNB and EUS-FNA appeared safe; however, diagnostic yield in the US-CNB group was significantly higher.
引用
收藏
页码:1596 / 1602
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition: How to achieve excellence [J].
Bhatia, Vikram ;
Varadarajulu, Shyam .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 29 (04) :417-430
[2]   Percutaneous Pancreatic BiopsiesStill an Effective Method for Histologic Confirmation of Malignancy [J].
Bhatti, Imran ;
Ojo, Dotun ;
Dennison, Ashley R. ;
Rees, Yvonne ;
Elabassy, Mosheir ;
Garcea, Giuseppe .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2016, 26 (04) :334-337
[3]   Indirect percutaneous core needle biopsy of solid pancreatic or peripancreatic lesions [J].
Chen, Po-Ting ;
Liu, Kao-Lang ;
Cheng, Tsu-Yao ;
Chang, Chin-Chen ;
Chang, Yeun-Chung .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) :292-303
[4]   Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy alone vs. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with rapid onsite evaluation in pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial [J].
Chen, Yen-, I ;
Chatterjee, Avijit ;
Berger, Robert ;
Kanber, Yonca ;
Wyse, Jonathan ;
Lam, Eric ;
Gan, Ian ;
Auger, Manon ;
Kenshil, Sana ;
Telford, Jennifer ;
Donnellan, Fergal ;
Quinlan, James ;
Lutzak, Gregory ;
Alshamsi, Fatma ;
Parent, Josee ;
Waschke, Kevin ;
Alghamdi, Adel ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
Metrakos, Peter ;
Chaudhury, Prosanto ;
Martel, Myriam ;
Dorreen, Alastair ;
Candido, Kristen ;
Miller, Corey ;
Adam, Viviane ;
Barkun, Alan ;
Zogopoulos, George ;
Wong, Clarence .
ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (01) :4-12
[5]   Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upaEuro [J].
Ducreux, M. ;
Cuhna, A. Sa. ;
Caramella, C. ;
Hollebecque, A. ;
Burtin, P. ;
Goere, D. ;
Seufferlein, T. ;
Haustermans, K. ;
Van Laethem, J. L. ;
Conroy, T. ;
Arnold, D. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 :V56-V68
[6]   Rapid On-Site Evaluation of EUS-FNA by Cytopathologist: An Experience of a Tertiary Hospital [J].
Ecka, Ruth Shifa ;
Sharma, Malay .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 41 (12) :1075-1080
[7]   Diagnostic strategy with a solid pancreatic mass [J].
Guarneri, Giovanni ;
Gasparini, Giulia ;
Crippa, Stefano ;
Andreasi, Valentina ;
Falconi, Massimo .
PRESSE MEDICALE, 2019, 48 (03) :E125-E145
[8]   Quality Improvement Guidelines for Percutaneous Needle Biopsy [J].
Gupta, Sanjay ;
Wallace, Michael J. ;
Cardella, John F. ;
Kundu, Sanjoy ;
Miller, Donald L. ;
Rose, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (07) :969-975
[9]   ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC DISEASE [J].
Huang, Ying ;
Shi, Jingwen ;
Chen, Yun-Yun ;
Li, Kao .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 44 (06) :1145-1154
[10]   Percutaneous Ultrasound-guided Core Needle Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Masses: Results in 250 Patients [J].
Kahriman, Guven ;
Ozcan, Nevzat ;
Dogan, Scrap ;
Ozmen, Soner ;
Deniz, Kemal .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2016, 44 (08) :470-473