Local context of local government participation in the innovation networks: Evidence from Poland

被引:2
作者
Godlewska, Malgorzata [1 ]
Mackiewicz, Marta [2 ]
机构
[1] SGH Warsaw Sch Econ, Coll Business Adm, Warsaw, Poland
[2] SGH Warsaw Sch Econ, Coll World Econ, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
entrepreneurial and innovation ecosystem; innovation networks; local context; local government; Poland; INFORMAL INSTITUTIONS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; IMPACT; POLICY; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; GEOGRAPHY; GROWTH; ISSUES;
D O I
10.2478/ijme-2023-0007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Innovation networks help to create innovation ecosystems by strengthen interactions between government, academia, business, and special institutions. The purpose of the article is to identify the relationship between the local context, i.e., the conditions and environment in which the Local Government Unit operates and their participation in the innovation networks. The analysis is based on a survey of 184 local government authorities in Poland, Local Administrative Unit level 2. The present study examines the hypothesis that the more supportive the local context is in the Polish municipalities and cities on district rights, the greater the engagement of local government authorities in local or regional innovation networks. The supportive local context was defined by a set of institutional, economic, geographical, demographic, cultural, political, managerial, and administrative factors. The research findings indicate that the key factors that influence the engagement of local government in local or regional innovation networks are institutional factors.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 263
页数:21
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Local government and governance in Norway: Stretched accountability in network politics [J].
Aars, J ;
Fimreite, AL .
SCANDINAVIAN POLITICAL STUDIES, 2005, 28 (03) :239-256
[2]   Geography, endogenous growth, and innovation [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Varga, A .
INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2002, 25 (01) :132-148
[3]   National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications [J].
Acs, Zoltan J. ;
Autio, Erkko ;
Szerb, Laszlo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (03) :476-494
[4]   An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development [J].
Amin, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 1999, 23 (02) :365-378
[5]  
Barsh J., 2008, The McKinsey Quarterly, issue, P38
[6]   Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sector [J].
Batterink, Maarten H. ;
Wubben, Emiel F. M. ;
Klerkx, Laurens ;
Omta, S. W. F. .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 22 (01) :47-76
[7]   Methodological Issues in Measuring Innovation Performance of Spatial Units [J].
Brenner, Thomas ;
Broekel, Tom .
INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2011, 18 (01) :7-37
[8]   Understanding citizen perception of European Union Cohesion Policy: the role of the local context [J].
Capello, Roberta ;
Perucca, Giovanni .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2018, 52 (11) :1451-1463
[9]   The new wave of regional innovation networks: Analysis, characteristics and strategy [J].
Cooke, P .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 1996, 8 (02) :159-171
[10]   Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study [J].
Dakhli, M ;
De Clercq, D .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 16 (02) :107-128