Stenting or angioplasty for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:3
|
作者
Gomes Flumignan, Ronald Luiz [1 ,2 ]
Civile, Vinicius Tassoni [2 ]
Areias, Libnah Leal [1 ]
Queiroz Flumignan, Carolina Dutra [2 ,3 ]
Amorim, Jorge Eduardo [1 ]
Lopes, Renato Delascio [4 ]
Nakano, Luis C. U. [1 ,2 ]
Costa Baptista-Silva, Jose Carlos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovascular Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Cochrane Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Ctr Univ Sao Camilo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Durham, NC USA
关键词
angioplasty; deep vein thrombosis; stenting; systematic review; venous thromboembolism; CATHETER-DIRECTED THROMBOLYSIS; VENOUS THROMBOSIS; THERAPY; THROMBECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033924
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Although the cornerstone treatment for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains anticoagulation, clinicians perform stenting or angioplasty (SA) in particular patients. To assess the effects of SA in this setting, we performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Methods:Based on the Cochrane standards, we searched the Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS and IBECS databases, and trial registries. Our primary outcomes were post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all-cause mortality. Results:We included 7 randomized controlled trial (1485 participants). There was no clinically significant difference between SA and best medical practice (BMP) for the additional treatment of acute DVT regarding PTS (standardized mean difference -7.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] -12.13 to -3.61; very low-certainty) and VTE (risk ratio [RR] 1.19, 95% CI 0.28-5.07, very low-certainty), and no deaths. Compared to BMP, the SA plus BMP and thrombolysis results in little to no difference in PTS (mean difference [MD] -1.07, 95% CI -1.12 to -1.02, moderate-certainty), VTE (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.95-2.31, low-certainty), and mortality (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.34-2.52, low-certainty). There was no clinical difference between stenting and BMP for chronic DVT regarding PTS (MD 2.73, 95% CI -2.10 to 7.56, very low certainty) and no VTE and death events. Conclusions:SA results in little to no difference in PTS, VTE and mortality in acute DVT compared to BMP. The evidence regarding SA in chronic DVT and whether SA, compared to BMP and thrombolysis, decreases PTS and VTE in acute DVT is uncertain. Open Science Framework (osf.io/f2dm6)
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anticoagulant treatment for upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Valeriani, Emanuele
    Di Nisio, Marcello
    Porceddu, Enrica
    Agostini, Fabiana
    Pola, Roberto
    Spoto, Silvia
    Donadini, Marco Paolo
    Ageno, Walter
    Porfidia, Angelo
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2022, 20 (03) : 661 - 670
  • [2] Treatment of Superficial Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Duffett, Lisa
    Kearon, Clive
    Rodger, Marc
    Carrier, Marc
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2019, 119 (03) : 479 - 489
  • [3] Deep Vein Thrombosis After Earthquake: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sahebi, Ali
    Nejati-Zarnaqi, Bayram
    Vasei, Narges
    Jahangiri, Katayoun
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2023, 17
  • [4] Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy versus thrombolysis in patients with iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lichtenberg, Michael K. W.
    Stahlhoff, Stefan
    Mlynczak, Katarzyna
    Golicki, Dominik
    Gagne, Paul
    Razavi, Mahmood K.
    de Graaf, Rick
    Kolluri, Raghu
    Kolasa, Katarzyna
    VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 50 (01) : 59 - 67
  • [5] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Xingnaojing Treatment for Stroke
    Peng, Weijun
    Yang, Jingjing
    Wang, Yang
    Wang, Weihao
    Xu, Jianxia
    Wang, Lexing
    Xing, Zhihua
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 2014
  • [6] Prevalence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients with superficial vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Di Minno, M. N. D.
    Ambrosino, P.
    Ambrosini, F.
    Tremoli, E.
    Di Minno, G.
    Dentali, F.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2016, 14 (05) : 964 - 972
  • [7] Melatonin in the treatment of cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis
    Mills, E
    Wu, P
    Seely, D
    Guyatt, G
    JOURNAL OF PINEAL RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (04) : 360 - 366
  • [8] Metformin Treatment and Homocysteine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhang, Qianying
    Li, Sheyu
    Li, Ling
    Li, Qianrui
    Ren, Kaiyun
    Sun, Xin
    Li, Jianwei
    NUTRIENTS, 2016, 8 (12)
  • [9] Catheter-directed thrombolysis vs. anticoagulation for the prevention and treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome in deep vein thrombosis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Mastoris, Ioannis
    Kokkinidis, Damianos G.
    Bikakis, Iosif
    Archontakis-Barakakis, Paraschos
    Papanastasiou, Christos A.
    Jonnalagadda, Anil Kumar
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    Bakoyiannis, Christos
    Palaiodimos, Leonidas
    Faillace, Robert T.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2019, 34 (10) : 675 - 682
  • [10] Effects of intermittent pneumatic compression devices interventions to prevent deep vein thrombosis in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kim, Nam Young
    Ryu, Seang
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):