Advertising bidding involving consumer information sharing

被引:0
作者
He, Xiang [1 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
Wang, Di [2 ]
Li, Zonghuo [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, 200 Xiaolingwei St, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, QUT Business Sch, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[3] Soochow Univ, Sch Polit & Publ Adm, 199 Renai St, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Consumer information sharing; Advertising bidding; Targeted advertising; Mass advertising; Salop city model; PRIVACY; SEARCH; AUCTIONS; COMPETITION; MARKETS; MEDIA; COST; BUY;
D O I
10.1007/s10660-023-09712-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As of recently, consumers can actively manage their level of individual-level information sharing, making the advertising bidding decision more complicated. In this paper, we study the advertising bidding decisions under the assumption that consumers can manage the level of their information sharing. Using a Salop city model to capture consumers' prior product preferences, we firstly find that whether a targeted advertisement or a mass advertisement is the optimal advertising type in a duopoly hinges on the neighbor seller's price and the level of consumer information sharing. Secondly, when we consider several sellers in an oligopoly, we find that the level of consumer information sharing affects the advertising bidding among different sellers. Thirdly, we compare the performance of a mass advertisement versus a targeted advertisement by numerical analysis in an oligopoly. We find that the targeted advertisements always perform better than mass advertisements in achieving optimal profit for both dominant sellers and non-dominant sellers in an oligopoly. Finally, we also discuss the regulatory implications for firms using consumer information as well as the managerial implications.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1066
页数:34
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   The personalization-privacy paradox: implications for new media [J].
Aguirre, Elizabeth ;
Roggeveen, Anne L. ;
Grewal, Dhruv ;
Wetzels, Martin .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER MARKETING, 2016, 33 (02) :98-110
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers
[3]   Position Auctions with Consumer Search [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Ellison, Glenn .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2011, 126 (03) :1213-1270
[4]   Channel Auctions [J].
Azevedo, Eduardo M. ;
Pennock, David M. ;
Waggoner, Bo ;
Weyl, E. Glen .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (05) :2075-2082
[5]   Addressing privacy predicaments in the digital marketplace: A power-relations perspective [J].
Bandara, Ruwan ;
Fernando, Mario ;
Akter, Shahriar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2020, 44 (05) :423-434
[6]   Competitive Imperfect Price Discrimination and Market Power [J].
Belleflamme, Paul ;
Lam, Wing Man Wynne ;
Vergote, Wouter .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2020, 39 (05) :996-1015
[7]   Monopoly price discrimination and privacy: The hidden cost of hiding [J].
Belleflamme, Paul ;
Vergote, Wouter .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 149 :141-144
[8]   Buy prices in online auctions: irrationality on the internet? [J].
Budish, EB ;
Takeyama, LN .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2001, 72 (03) :325-333
[9]   Combining guaranteed and spot markets in display advertising: Selling guaranteed page views with stochastic demand [J].
Chen, Bowei ;
Huang, Jingmin ;
Huang, Yufei ;
Kollias, Stefanos ;
Yue, Shigang .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 280 (03) :1144-1159
[10]   AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ONLINE ADVERTISING USING BEHAVIORAL TARGETING [J].
Chen, Jianqing ;
Stallaert, Jan .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2014, 38 (02) :429-+