Environmental footprints of soybean production in China

被引:12
|
作者
Zhang, Qian [1 ]
Hong, Jinglan [2 ]
Zhang, Tianzuo [2 ]
Tian, Xu [3 ]
Geng, Yong [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ]
Zhai, Yijie [2 ]
Liu, Wenjing [5 ]
Shen, Xiaoxu [2 ]
Bai, Yueyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm, Jinan 250358, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shandong Key Lab Environm Proc & Hlth, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Municipal Finance Beijing, Beijing 100060, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water footprint; Fossil energy footprint; Carbon footprint; Life cycle assessment; Soybeans; China; WATER FOOTPRINT; IMPACTS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-022-02424-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a significant protein source for humans and animals, soybean (Glycine max) has experienced a fast growth with the rapid development of population and economy. Despite broad interest in energy consumption and CO2 emissions generated by soybean production, there are few impact-oriented water footprint assessments of soybean production. This study evaluates the fossil energy, carbon, and water footprints of China's soybean production so that key environmental impacts can be identified. To provide reliable results for decision-making, uncertainty analysis is conducted based on the Monte Carlo model. Results show that the impact on climate change, ecosystem quality, human health, and resources is 3.33 x 10(3) kg CO2 eq (GSD(2) = 1.87), 6.18 x 10(-5) Species center dot yr (GSD(2) = 1.81), 3.26 x 10(-3) Disability-adjusted Life Years (GSD(2) = 1.81), and 81.51 $ (GSD(2) = 2.28), respectively. Freshwater ecotoxicity is the dominant contributor (77.69%) to the ecosystem quality category, while climate change (85.22%) is the dominant contributor to the human health category. Key factors analysis results show that diammonium phosphate and diesel, and on-site emissions, are the major contributors to the overall environmental burden of soybean production. Several policy recommendations are proposed, focusing on trade structure optimization, efficient resource use, and technological improvements. Such policy recommendations provide valuable insights to those decision-makers so that they can prepare appropriate mitigation policies.
引用
收藏
页码:9047 / 9065
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Environmental footprints of soybean production in China
    Qian Zhang
    Jinglan Hong
    Tianzuo Zhang
    Xu Tian
    Yong Geng
    Wei Chen
    Yijie Zhai
    Wenjing Liu
    Xiaoxu Shen
    Yueyang Bai
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 9047 - 9065
  • [2] Environmental footprints show China and Europe's evolving resource appropriation for soybean production in Mato Grosso, Brazil
    Lathuilliere, Michael J.
    Johnson, Mark S.
    Galford, Gillian L.
    Couto, Eduardo G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (07):
  • [3] Strategies to mitigate the environmental footprints of meat, egg and milk production in northern China
    Lu, Yang
    Ma, Wenqi
    Shao, Liwei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 443
  • [4] Comprehensive evaluation of environmental footprints of regional crop production: A case study of Chizhou City, China
    Wang, Lei
    Li, Lianqing
    Cheng, Kun
    Pan, Genxing
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 164
  • [5] Energy and water footprints of cereal production in China
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Bai, Yueyang
    Ji, Changxing
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Hong, Jinglan
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 164
  • [6] Environmental and resources footprints between China and EU countries
    Tian, Xu
    Rui, Wu
    Geng, Yong
    Bleischwitz, Raimund
    Che, Yihui
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 168 : 322 - 330
  • [7] Environmental footprints of meat, milk and egg production in Argentina
    Arrieta, Ezequiel M.
    Aguiar, Sebastian
    Gonzalez Fischer, Carlos
    Cuchietti, Anibal
    Cabrol, Diego A.
    Gonzalez, Alejandro D.
    Jobbagy, Esteban G.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 347
  • [8] Environmental footprints of beef cattle production in the United States
    Rotz, C. Alan
    Asem-Hiablie, Senorpe
    Place, Sara
    Thoma, Greg
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 169 : 1 - 13
  • [9] Mitigation of Multiple Environmental Footprints for China's Pig Production Using Different Land Use Strategies
    Long, Weitong
    Wang, Hongliang
    Hou, Yong
    Chadwick, Dave
    Ma, Yifei
    Cui, Zhenling
    Zhang, Fusuo
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (08) : 4440 - 4451
  • [10] Regional water footprints of potential biofuel production in China
    Xie, Xiaomin
    Zhang, Tingting
    Wang, Liming
    Huang, Zhen
    BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10