Procedural Fidelity Reporting in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior from 2007-2021

被引:1
作者
Preas, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
Halbur, Mary E. [2 ]
Carroll, Regina A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Austin Coll, Sherman, TX USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Munroe Meyer Inst, 9012 Q St, Omaha, NE 68127 USA
关键词
Interobserver agreement; Procedural fidelity; Treatment integrity; Verbal behavior; TREATMENT INTEGRITY; INTERVENTIONS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s40616-023-00197-w
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Procedural fidelity refers to the degree to which procedures for an assessment or intervention (i.e., independent variables) are implemented consistent with the prescribed protocols. Procedural fidelity is an important factor in demonstrating the internal validity of an experiment and clinical treatments. Previous reviews evaluating the inclusion of procedural fidelity in published empirical articles demonstrated underreporting of procedural fidelity procedures and measures within specific journals. We conducted a systematic review of The Analysis of Verbal Behavior (TAVB) to evaluate the trends in procedural fidelity reporting from 2007 to 2021. Of the 253 articles published in TAVB during the reporting period, 144 of the articles (168 studies) met inclusionary criteria for further analysis. Our results showed that 54% of studies reported procedural fidelity data, which is slightly higher than previous reviews. In comparison, interobserver-agreement data were reported for a high percentage of studies reviewed (i.e., 93%). Further discussion of results and applied research implications are included.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Comparing Multiple Methods to Measure Procedural Fidelity of Discrete-trial Instruction
    Bergmann, Samantha
    Niland, Haven
    Gavidia, Valeria Laddaga
    Strum, Marcus D.
    Harman, Michael J.
    [J]. EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN, 2023, 46 (03) : 201 - 220
  • [2] Updated Strategies for Making Regular Contact With the Scholarly Literature
    Briggs, Adam M.
    Mitteer, Daniel R.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE, 2022, 15 (02) : 541 - 552
  • [3] Carr JE, 2010, BEHAV ANAL PRACT, V3, P13
  • [4] Experimental control and threats to internal validity of concurrent and nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs
    Christ, Theodore J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2007, 44 (05) : 451 - 459
  • [5] Procedural Integrity Reporting in the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management (2000-2020)
    Cymbal, Daniel
    Wilder, David A.
    Cruz, Nelmar
    Ingraham, Grant
    Llinas, Mary
    Clark, Ronald
    Kamlowsky, Marissa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2022, 42 (03) : 230 - 243
  • [6] Interobserver agreement and procedural fidelity: An odd asymmetry
    Essig, Lindsay
    Rotta, Katarina
    Poling, Alan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2023, 56 (01) : 78 - 85
  • [7] Treatment Integrity Reporting in Behavior Analysis in Practice 2008-2019
    Falakfarsa, Galan
    Brand, Denys
    Jones, Lea
    Godinez, Erik S.
    Richardson, Deborah C.
    Hanson, Robbie J.
    Velazquez, Savannah D.
    Wills, Colin
    [J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE, 2022, 15 (02) : 443 - 453
  • [8] Assessing Parents' Treatment Fidelity: A Survey of Practitioners in Home Settings
    Fallon, Lindsay M.
    Cathcart, Sadie C.
    Sanetti, Lisa M. Hagermoser
    [J]. FOCUS ON AUTISM AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2020, 35 (01) : 15 - 25
  • [9] TREATMENT INTEGRITY IN APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS WITH CHILDREN
    GRESHAM, FM
    GANSLE, KA
    NOELL, GH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1993, 26 (02) : 257 - 263
  • [10] Trends in Reporting Procedural Integrity: A Comparison
    Han, Justin B.
    Bergmann, Samantha
    Brand, Denys
    Wallace, Michele D.
    St. Peter, Claire C.
    Feng, Jennifer
    Long, Brian P.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE, 2023, 16 (02) : 388 - 398